On April 29, 2026, U.S. Congressman Josh Gottheimer (NJ-5) and Congressman Mike Lawler (NY-17) introduced a bipartisan resolution calling on social media and streaming platforms to refrain from revealing the subversive activities and crimes of the Jews. It is couched in terms of stopping antisemitic “online disinformation, conspiracy theories, and extremist rhetoric.” But it is essentially a call for streaming platforms to censor and de-platform any revelation of Jewish influence and crimes.
Notably, Congressman Gottheimer is a Jewish Zionist who has received more than $2.0 million from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and other pro Israel PACS. Congressman Lawler is a Catholic Zionist who has received more than $1.0 million from AIPAC and other pro-Israel PACS.
During the Babylonian captivity, an occult society of Jews replaced God’s commands with Babylonian dogma. Their new religion became Judaism. Jesus explained the corrupt Judaic religion: “Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” (Mark 7:7) Jesus revealed the heart of Judaism: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.” John 8:44. Jesus was not using hyperbole. He was stating a fact.
Many think that Zionism is the struggle by the Jews for a homeland. Zionism is much more than the Jews establishing a homeland. That is merely a cover for a much grander plan to rule the world. Zionism is the child of the Talmud, and Talmudism is communism. Moses Mordecai Marx Levi, alias Karl Marx, was a Jew and a Satanist. The Jewish Zion is a counterfeit of God’s Zion, which is in a heavenly Jerusalem. Revelation 21:10.
The communist revolution in Russia was planned and executed by Jews according to the doctrines of their Talmud. Rabbi S. Wise stated in the May 5, 1935, American Bulletin: “Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.” On April 4, 1918, The Jewish Chronicle stated that “the ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.” The Bolshevik revolution was Jewish from top to bottom. Of 556 leading conspirators in the Bolshevik state in 1918-19 there were 17 Russians, two Ukrainians, eleven Armenians, 35 Latvians, 15 Germans, one Hungarian, ten Georgians, three Poles, three Finns, one Czech, one Karaim, and 457 Jews. As pointed out by Robert Wilton in his book The Last Days of the Romanovs, the communist revolution was not an insurrection by Russians, but rather a secret invasion by Jews. As of 1983, the Premier of the Soviet Union was a Jew (Andropov) and 23 out of 25 members of the Politburo (the Soviet ruling clique) were Jews. In addition, every top member of the Soviet military and police was a Jew. Colonel Jack Mohr states: “One of the greatest difficulties of the Talmudic Pharisees has been that of bringing communism into power while trying to conceal its Talmudic origin.” The Talmudic Jews have been successful in preventing any revelations about their involvement in establishing a new communist world order by labeling anyone who exposes their efforts an antisemite. When the Zionist Jews gain control of their world government, they will not allow for any religion other than their religion.
As of the year 2000 there were 268 kibbutzim in Israel. A Kibbutz is a collective Jewish society. According to the Jewish Virtual Library, Kibbutz is “the fulfillment of the idea ‘from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.’” That is a direct quote from Karl Marx. The Kibbutz collective is the purest form of communism.
Henry Makow estimates that the Cheka (later renamed OGPU, then NKVD and finally KGB) was responsible for at least 20 million deaths. The primary foci of the slaughter were Gentiles in general and Christians in particular. According to Slava Katamidze: “The Church became the target of Bolshevik hostility from the very beginning.”
Jewish Religious Doctrine Teaches Hatred For Gentiles
The congressional resolution is premised on a long list of falsehoods. This article will address only two of the falsehoods in the congressional resolution. The resolution specifically cites Candace Owens’ revelation that “Jews are taught by ancient religious texts to hate non-Jews.” The resolution claims the allegation of Jewish hatred of Gentiles is false. But authoritative evidence from Jewish religious texts proves that it is, in fact, true.
For example, according to a tractate in the Jewish Talmud, Christians, who are described as those who read the New Testament (“uncanonical books”), have no portion in the world to come. Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 90a, Sanhedrin Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices Chapters I – VI by Jacob Shachter, Chapters VII – XI by H. Freedman, B.A., Ph.D., Under the Editorship of Rabbi Dr I. Epstein B.A., Ph.D., D. Lit. (1961).
Jews have a particular hatred for Christians. The hatred by Jews against Christians is so intense that Jews are taught to utter a curse when passing a Christian Church, calling on the Jewish god (Hashem) to “destroy this house of the proud.” Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, at 534 (2008). See also Tractate Berakhot, 58b.
Jewish author Israel Shahak, who was a Hebrew University of Jerusalem Professor and head of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights, revealed that “Jewish children are actually taught – passages such as that which commands every Jew, whenever passing near a cemetery, to utter a blessing if the cemetery is Jewish, but to curse the mothers of the dead if it is non-Jewish.” Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, at 93. See also Israel Shahak, The Jewish religion and its attitude to non-Jews: Part 1, July 10, 1981. See also, Tractate Berakhot, 58b.
Elizabeth Dilling explains: “The ‘religious’ Orthodox Jew recites the ‘Eighteen Benedictions,’ or ‘Shemoneh Esreh,’ three times weekdays, four times on holidays and Sabbaths, the 7th and 12th of which curse the Christians and non-Jews to hell and perdition. Thus, the ‘good Orthodox Jew’ gives us Christians 6 cursings on ordinary days, 8 on ‘specials.’” Elizabeth Dilling, The Jewish Religion, Its Influence Today (1963).
According to the Talmud, Christians are allied with hell (Babylonian Talmud: Tractate ‘Abodah Zarah, Folio 17a), and Jesus is not only cursed (Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin Folio 106a), but he is also described as being tormented in boiling hot semen. Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Gittin Folio 57a.
Rabbi ben Yohai, who believed he was beyond the jurisdiction of God (Zohar, Bereshit, 18d-19a), did not think Gentiles were even worthy to live. His views regarding Gentiles were that “even the best of Gentiles should all be killed.” Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, at 196 (2008). Rabbi ben Yohai is not a rabbi on the fringes of Judaism; he is, in fact, one of the most revered of rabbis in Judaism; his grave is a shrine in Israel. He authored the Zohar, the principal work of Kabbalah.
According to Orthodox Judaism, Gentiles have no property or other rights that can be asserted against a Jew. Baba Bathra 54b: Property of Gentiles is like the desert; whoever gets there first gets it.
Sanhedrin 57a: If a Gentile robs a Jew, he must pay him back; but if a Jew robs a Gentile, the Jew may keep the loot. Likewise, if a Gentile kills a Jew, the Gentile is to be killed; but if a Jew kills a Gentile, there is no death penalty.
Sanhedrin 52b: Adultery forbidden with the neighbor’s wife, but is not forbidden with the wife of a heathen (Gentile). The implication is that a heathen is not a neighbor.
Talmudic Judaism has the most intense hatred for Jesus. While the proposed congressional edict denies it, the Jewish Talmud clearly teaches such things, Benjamin Freedman, a former Talmudic Jew, stated that: “there have never been recorded more vicious an vile libelous blasphemies of Jesus, of Christians and the Christian faith than you will find between the covers of the 63 books of the Talmud which forms the basis of Jewish religious law, as well as being the textbook used in the training of rabbis.” For example:
Sanhedrin 106a & b: Mary was a whore; Jesus was an evil man.
Shabbath 104b: Jesus was a magician and a fool. Mary was an adulteress.
Sanhedrin 43a: Jesus was guilty of sorcery and apostasy; he deserved execution. The disciples of Jesus deserve to be killed.
Gittin 57b: Jesus was sent to hell, where he is punished by boiling excrement for mocking the Rabbis.
Jewish Religious Doctrine Promotes Sexual Assault on Children
The proposed congressional edict claims that Candice Owens wrongly states that “Jewish texts and traditions promote the sexual assault of children.” In fact, the evidence, although suppressed by the Jewish-controlled press, is clear that Jewish religious tradition and texts promote sexual assault on children.
Orthodox Judaism has a very permissive attitude toward sexual deviance. For example:
Sanhedrin 55b: It is permitted to have sexual intercourse with a girl three years and one day old. See also Yebamoth 57b, 60b; Abodah Zarah 37a.
Sanhedrin 54b: If a man has sex with a boy less than nine years old, he is not guilty of pederasty.
Kethoboth 11b: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for when the girl is less than three years old, it is as if one puts the finger into the eye, tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.
Michael Hoffman explains the sexual deviance that is excused within orthodox Judaism:
In defiance of the Old Testament’s proscription against men lying with men (Leviticus 20:13), the Talmud nullifies this Old Testament law in at least five ways: by permitting sex with boys under age nine; permitting a legal slap on the wrist for sodomy with the halachic loophole created for “accidental” sodomy; permitting the prideful estimation of the Judiac male as being incapable of sinning in this manner; permitting the act of fellatio on infants by the rnohel (circumciser) during a circumcision, and by cultivating a flourishing homo-erotic culture in the all-male ritual bath scene.
* * *
The traditional Orthodox Judaic bris (circumcision) encompasses a homosexual act regarded as essential to the circumcision ritual by Talmudists. We regret having to relate to the reader the ugly and frankly nauseating details of this rite: that the mohel actually performs fellatio (metzitzah b’peh) on the baby boy by placing the infant’s penis in his mouth and sucking the blood from the wounded penis with his lips. This is not an isolated case by a crazed rabbi. This is the religious norm in circumcisions performed by Orthodox rabbis in a ceremony that would be at home in the pages of Richard Von Krafft-Ebing’s Psychopathia Sexualis.
The bris consists of three stages: excision of the outer part of the prepuce (milah); cutting of the inner lining of the foreskin to uncover the glans (peri’ah); and the sucking of the blood from the circumcised penis using the mouth and lips of the mohel (metzitzah b’peh). The rabbinic circumcision rite, or bris, is authorized by a combination of Talmud-derived halacha and custom (minhag). There is no support for this form of circumcision in God’s law in the Old Testament. But rabbinic tradition offers ample warrant.
Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, at 678 (2008).
Orthodox Jews claim that the reason the mohel sucks on the baby’s penis is to clean the wound and stop the bleeding. There is no other medical procedure where oral sucking is used to clean a wound and stop bleeding. Such conduct is medically dangerous. There are very real health risks attendant to this sexual deviance practiced during the bris ceremony of circumcision. Dr. Sherwin Nuland is a Jewish surgeon who considers himself agnostic, but still attends synagogue. He is the biographer of the medieval Jewish physician Maimonides. Dr. Nuland explains that there is no medical justification, and it is dangerous for a mohel to suck on a baby’s penis after circumcision:
One of the first things I was taught when I began my surgical training about 50 years ago was that I must never spit into an open wound. To my knowledge, that is still a good rule.
As ridiculous as such a statement sounds, it is not much more ridiculous than the idea of deliberately exposing a freshly cut incision on the penis of a newborn — whose immune mechanisms are, of course, not yet fully developed — to the germs in human saliva. Any fool should know that such virulent bacteria and viruses must never come into direct contact with a wound, much less that of a neonate.
Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, at 678 (2008).
Michael Hoffman concludes: “All of the risks common to homosexual sex are present in the Orthodox Judaic bris.” Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, at 681 (2008). The practice of fellatio on young babies by a Jewish mohel is why venereal disease is common within the Orthodox Jewish communities. Venereal disease can be fatal for a newborn child. For example, the New York Times for Friday, August 26, 2005 contained a report that the “circumcision ritual practiced by some Orthodox Jews alarmed [New York] City health officials, who say it may have led to three cases of herpes-one of them fatal-in infants. The practice is known as oral suction, or in Hebrew, metzitzah b’peh: after removing the foreskin of the penis, the practitioner, or mohel, sucks the blood from the wound to clean it.” “Dozens of ultra-Orthodox rabbis signed a full-page Hebrew advertisement that ran in the February 25, 2005 issue of Yated Ne’eman, defending the practice.”
As a result of the fatal infant herpes contraction, the New York State Department of Health began scrutinizing whether to allow the practice of oral suction by Jewish mohels to continue. The Orthodox Jews, fearing that new health regulations could put an end to their pederastic practice, went into political high gear and negotiated a deal with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Bloomberg (who is Jewish) promised to keep the metzitzah b’peh (fellatio on an infant) legal. In return, the Orthodox Jews as a bloc supported his election. Jim Rutenberg and Andy Newman, reporters for the New York Times, describe the events:
With three days to go before Election Day, ultra-Orthodox Jewish leaders in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, held what was by far the largest rally of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s campaign. With searchlights bouncing across the Brooklyn sky and klezmer music blaring from speakers hoisted on cranes, thousands of Hasidic Jews, in black hats or head scarves, cheered the beaming mayor from rooftops and blocks upon blocks of bleachers. When … Rabbi David Niederman addressed the throngs, he praised the mayor for his … support for the constitutional separation of church and state. For many in the crowd, the last reference was code for the administration’s decision to hold off from taking action against an ancient form of ritualistic circumcision.
Jim Rutenberg and Andy Newman, NY Times, January 6, 2006 (quoted by Michael Hoffman in Judaism Discovered, at 682-83).
In June 2006, Mayor Bloomberg kept his part of the bargain and brokered an agreement between the New York State Department of Health and the rabbis, renewing permission for fellatio on infant boys as part of the bris.
The bris is nothing more than pedophilia masquerading as a religious ritual. If a gentile engaged in the conduct of the Jewish mohel of sucking on an infant’s penis, he would be prosecuted under the New York Penal Code § 130.50 for engaging in a criminal sexual act in the first degree. That New York law states:
§ 130.50 Criminal sexual act in the first degree.
A person is guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree when he or she engages in oral sexual conduct or anal sexual conduct with another person:
1. By forcible compulsion; or
2. Who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless; or
3. Who is less than eleven years old; or
4. Who is less than thirteen years old and the actor is eighteen years old or more.
Criminal sexual act in the first degree is a class B felony.
Anyone convicted of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree is subjected to the potential punishment of up to 25 years in prison and is put on the rolls as a registered sex offender. There are similar laws in every state against fellatio on infants. The laws are simply not enforced against Jewish mohels.
The conduct of the mohel in sucking on the penis of an infant during circumcision is just one example of the permissive attitude toward pedophilia within orthodox Jewry. The permissiveness in the Jewish community toward what would ordinarily be criminal sexual conduct creates an environment that is rife for abuse of children. In the wake of the Rabbi Kolko man-boy sex scandal, “[a]n authority from the esteemed haredi organization Agudath Israel, Rabbi Avi Shafran, openly acknowledged that sexual abuse is indeed a problem that requires more attention and measures than the [Jewish] community currently brings to bear.”
Many victims of sex abuse by orthodox rabbis suffer in silence. Jewish reporter Robert Kolker opines that there is more sexual abuse among the fervently Orthodox Jewish community than elsewhere because repression in the Orthodox Judaic community “creates a fertile environment for deviance.” Rabbi Avi Shafran acknowledged that “for a person whose whole life revolves around the community, ‘the ostracism that results from publicly confronting a leader of that community’ can be worse than death.” Eugene Myer states that “[o]thers believe that underreporting of clergy sexual misconduct may in fact facilitate abuse.” Dr. Hella Winston explains:
Rabbi Avi Shafran on the Beit Din and Abuse: Among many Orthodox Jews, the preferred forum for adjudicating communal disputes is a bet din, a rabbinic court. But critics say such panels often try to dissuade sex abuse victims from pursuing their complaints, a charge vigorously denied by (Agudath Israel spokesman Rabbi Avi) Shafran. But, he added, ‘In cases where there is some degree of doubt, the beit din has a responsibility to counsel against going to authorities until there is proven criminal activity.’
In other words, in 99% of abuse cases, Rabbi Shafran’s ‘gedolim’ will say that it is forbidden to go to the police. Why? Because the victims of abuse are largely underage. Their testimony is invalid in a beit din, and abuse happens in secret, away from witnesses – except, of course, for the abused child. In a similar vein, Rabbi Chaim Pinchas Scheinberg told victims of Rabbi Yehudah Kolko and their parents that, because Rabbi Kolko did not penetrate the boys (he only rubbed his erect penis against them), according to halakha, no abuse happened. Therefore it is forbidden to go to police. This is Agudath Israel. This is the gedolim. This is Orthodox Judaism.
Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, at 705 (2008).
Rabbi Yehuda Kolko was systematically protected by his fellow rabbis as he molested a series of young children over a 30 year span. After years of rampant molestation by Rabbi Kolko, approximately 10 rabbis met in 1984 to discuss what to do about Rabbi Kolko’s molestation of young boys at the yeshiva (boys rabbinical school) where he worked. It was decided to do nothing, since the yeshiva lawyer told the rabbis that the yeshiva would be liable for not having reported their knowledge to the police earlier. Rabbi Kolko was allowed to continue at the school, and his molestation of the children continued unabated.
In 1985, a beit din (a/k/a bais din) was held with 5 more rabbis to examine the molestation complaints against Rabbi Kolko. The Rabbi who ran the yeshiva at which Rabbi Kolko worked was able to end the beit din after hearing only one day of testimony. A second biet din was set up by the yeshiva rabbi with the objective of clearing Rabbi Kolko; no molestation victims appeared before that beit din. Again, no action was taken against Rabbi Kolko and he was able to continue his molestation.
Rabbi Kolko continued his molestation until 2006, when he was finally prosecuted for child molestation. Through political pressure from the politically powerful orthodox Jewish community, Rabbi Kolko was allowed to plead to two lesser counts of misdemeanor child endangerment. The prosecutor claimed that he allowed the plea to the lesser charges because one victim was too young and the family would not allow him to testify. The father of the victim states that was not true; in fact, he felt it would be a beneficial catharsis for his son to testify. The father of the other victim stated that he was pressed by the prosecution to keep his son from testifying. Both children remain plaintiffs against Rabbi Kolko in a civil suit and are expected to be witnesses against him in the civil trial.
All along the way as charges of child molestation surfaced against Rabbi Kolko, rabbis threatened victims and their families, publically disparaged them, and put pressure on them to keep quiet. The response by the orthodox Jewish community to the molestation evidence against Rabbi Kolko reveals the permissive attitude toward pedophilia in orthodox Jewry. Hella Winston explains how the orthodox Jewish community tolerates such conduct:
[The] bombshell article [in the May 2006 New York Magazine about sexual deviance within orthodox Jewry] (disclosure: I was quoted in it) suggested several reasons why confronting sexual abuse is a particular challenge for ultra-Orthodox Jews: the social stigma associated with being the victim of abuse; the ages-old Jewish prohibition against mesira, or “informing” to the secular authorities; and the religious proscriptions against lashon hara (gossip) and chilul Hashem (“desecrating God’s name,” which in this context means giving the community a “bad name”). These impediments silence victims and protect perpetrators.”
The code of silence within orthodox Jewry explains how it took over 30 years for anything to be done to stop Rabbi Kolko. The existence of the code of silence suggests that there are many protected rabbinical pedophiles lurking among the orthodox Jews. Rabbi Kolko is just the tip of the iceberg. Shaiya Brizel revealed in his book, The Silence of the Ultra-Orthodox, that his father, Rabbi Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel for years used his position to sodomize ultra-Orthodox boys. The greatest rabbis of the city were told about Brizel’s conduct and did nothing to stop it.
Shaiya stated that his father committed the acts in empty synagogues during the hours between prayers and in other places. “The greatest of the ultra-Orthodox rabbis…like Rabbi Landau and the halachic sage Shmuel Halevi Hausner of Bnei Brak, knew and kept silent.” Shaiya Brizel, reveals that his father would hunt for his victims within certain yeshiva, and when the head of the yeshiva discovered that his father was sodomizing the children he kept silent and did not contact the police.
When Rabbi Brizel’s wife found out about her husband’s conduct she demanded a divorce, but batteries of rabbis tried to calm her down so that she would not destroy the good Brizel name. “They could live with the fact that one of their own had raped minors, but for them divorce was an impossible situation.”
Shaiya discovered that his father’s conduct was common among ultra-Orthodox Jewish men. On two occasions, “once during prayers in a synagogue, and once during a Gemara (Talmud) study hour at Rabbi Eliezer Shach’s Ponevezh Yeshiva, ultra-Orthodox men who were strangers to him touched his sexual organ, presumably on the assumption that he followed in his father’s footsteps. The first time, he made a fuss, only to discover that the only thing that interested the people there was to hush the whole thing up. The second time, he made do with a whispered warning to the man.”
“On the day the book was published, Brizel met with the head of the Hachemei Lublin Yeshiva, Rabbi Avraham Vazner. “He told me that publishing the book was a million times worse than what my father had done.” After Shaiya’s book came out, associates of the local rabbi of the Hasidic synagogue he attended informed him that he was persona non grata.
In the conversation with [women’s magazine] La’isha, Shaiya’s father, Rabbi Brizel, said that he was indeed a homosexual, “But I have had treatment and today I am no longer like that. All this is behind me.” When asked if he had sexual relations with minors, the rabbi replied: “Perhaps I will talk about that some other time.”
In the face of that evidence of institutional pederasty, U.S. Congressmen Josh Gottheimer and Mike Lawler, on behalf of their Jewish paymasters, pronounce that anyone who reveals the truth of the regularized sexual abuse of children by rabbinical Jews is an antisemite who must be censored.
