Shooter’s Video Reveals That the Buffalo Shooting Was Fake

Below is a video of the May 14, 2022, Buffalo, NY, shooting taken by a camera apparently attached to the headgear worn by the alleged shooter. We can see his view of the alleged shooting. But the video shows that the shooting is fake. BitChute took the video down from its video streaming website, stating: “This video is blocked under the following Community Guideline: Abhorrent Violence.”

Of course, former Vice President Biden would never let a good tragedy go to waste, especially when orchestrated by his friends at the CIA. He has used the shooting to whip up racial hatred and call for new gun control measures.

The Bidens at the Site of the Shooting

Watch closely in the video at the man standing near the trunk as the alleged shooter exits his car. The shooter allegedly shoots a lady, but the person standing near the trunk falls over as though he is shot also. The problem is that he could not have been shot. The shooter was using what appeared to be an AR15. That weapon shoots a .223 caliber bullet on a very precise trajectory. It was impossible for the gun pointed at the woman to shoot the man.

The script called for the gunman to shoot the lady and the man near the car trunk. It appears that the man near the trunk followed the script and fell to that ground as though being shot. The gunman realized he forgot to shoot the man at the trunk and panned the mussel of his gun back to him to shoot him. But the man had already fallen to the ground as he was instructed according to the script. The gunman had to improvise and shot the man as he was on the ground.

Full Video of Buffalo NY Alleged Shooting.

Since posting this blog a number of people have noted the convincing fall by the woman in the blue dress. Her fall is not convincing to those familiar with wound ballistics. Indeed, it is rather suspicious and yet another reason to disbelieve the authenticity of the shooting.
A person would only fall as that woman fell if she were shot in the head. It is obvious that the woman was not shot in the head because of the complete lack of blood. A head wound would cause an explosive amount of blood to be extruded from the massive exit wound.
In a case where a gunshot strikes the heart causing it to stop immediately, there is enough residual oxygen in the blood to allow a person with a stopped heart to continue to function for 10 to 15 seconds before incapacitation. See Urey Patrick & John Hall, In Defense of Self and Others (2004). For instance in a case where a knife attacker is charging at a victim “[t]he harsh reality in such circumstance is that unless the shot happens to hit the attacker in the central nervous system, the attack will succeed.” Id. at 109. The woman in the video was not shot in the head.
Assume that the person is not shot directly in the heart but is shot and is bleeding profusely. Total incapacitation by blood loss does not begin to occur until the shooting victim loses approximately 20%-25% of her blood.  Such blood loss in an average healthy adult would take approximately 5 seconds assuming the largest artery in the human body (thoracic artery) was severed. It is notable that in the Buffalo shooting scenario there was no visible blood flowing from the woman’s body. There is simply no way to explain her immediate incapacitation.
A number of anecdotal cases were presented in which the victims of the gunshots, including those shot through the heart, continued to engage in strenuous physical activity before they finally died.  Patrick & Hall at 64 (citing Levy, V., et al., Survival Time in Gunshot and Stab Wound Victims, The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 1988; 9(3)).  Washington v. Starke, 855 F.2d 346 (6th Cir. 1988) (after being shot in the back of the head by an officer with a .38 caliber handgun, the subject ran for a distance of 298 feet, before collapsing and dying from the wound); Jones v. Wittenberg University, 534 F.2d 1203 (6th Cir. 1976) (after being shot in the chest by a security guard, the subject kept running for a distance of 30 to 40 yards, before he collapsed and died); Amato v. United States, 549 F. Supp. 863 (D.N.J. 1982), aff’d, 729 F.2d 1445 (3d Cir. 1984) (A perimeter was set up in order to arrest the robbers as they exited the bank.  As the robbers ran from the bank one of the bank robbers fired on the agents who were converging on them.  The chain reaction caused by that shot was described by the court as equivalent to the splitting of an atom.  Eleven agents fired 39 rounds which included 281 bullets and buckshot pellets.  The bank robber who fired on the agents was killed.  However, it is notable that the other bank robber survived the shooting, even though he suffered 65 bullet wounds); Goold v. Saunders, 194 N.W. 227 (Iowa 1923) (plaintiff survives after being shot with 125 bullets).
In the April 11, 1986, FBI Miami Shootout, bank robbers William Matix and Michael Platt were each wounded with several rounds, but were able to continue to shoot at FBI Agents for over 4 minutes killing two FBI Agents and wounding an additional five agents before Matix and Platt were finally killed.  Matix was shot 6 times and Platt was shot 12 times during the shootout.  Greg Solano, Knife verses Gun, Police Shootings, Sheriff Greg Solano Blog, (September 06, 2006).  Dr. W. French Anderson analyzed the FBI Miami Shootout in detail.  His analysis revealed that the first wound suffered by Michael Platt to his right upper arm and chest was unsurvivable and was the primary injury responsible for Platt’s death.  However, after receiving that fatal wound, Platt continued to engage the FBI Agents in the gun battle and suffered 5 more gunshot wounds in the minutes before he shot and killed two FBI Agents and seriously wounded at least one other agent.  At the beginning of the gun battle, William Matix was shot in his arm and head and fell unconscious.  After several minutes, he regained consciousness and rejoined the gun battle, firing his gun at the FBI Agents and local police officers who arrived at the scene before he was finally shot and killed by an FBI Agent.  W. French Anderson, M.D., Forensic Analysis of the April 11, 1986, FBI Firefight, Firearms Tactical Institute.
The woman’s fall in the video was certainly an amazing piece of stunt work. which was obviously well-practiced in order to sell the shooting. But keep in mind that her fall like that after being shot in the torso sells the shooting to most people who are not aware of the effect of bullets on the human body. Knowledgeable persons know that a torso shot is NOT immediately incapacitating where the person loses all function within a millisecond. Her fall impeaches the authenticity of the shooting.

Below is an analysis of the shooting by Brian Davidson, along with Jim Fetzer and Giuseppe Vafanculo.

Shooter’s Video of the Christchurch Shooting is Being Suppressed Because It Proves the Alleged Massacre Was a Hoax

Within a Week of the Uvalde Shooting Authorities Have Proposed Demolishing the School Which Would Destroy All Evidence (or Lack Thereof)

10 thoughts on “Shooter’s Video Reveals That the Buffalo Shooting Was Fake

  1. Yes, it was fake. They ALWAYS go cheap on the fake blood. The crisis actors are lousy too. This was sort of like the fake Christchurch hoax in New Zealand. Obama had dozens of these fake shootings and now Biden is copying Obama. God will judge these liars, eventually.

  2. I wonder why he says “sorry” to the guy at the end of the video? The lady who falls at the beginning starts to fall before she is shot and she really looks like she is acting the fall. Also, I saw no blood but I wouldn’t know if there should be blood right away like in the movies.

  3. I also think this whole mess was fake. It was too clean and it seemed to be staged as well. It didn’t have that gritty real-life feel to it. I also know that with a caliber of that kind of bullet, head shots would have created a LOT of blood. Anyone with experience in ballistics and forensics would know this right off. This is the one thing that really stood out to me. There was little to no blood anywhere.

    It’s a shame the gov’t needs to stoop to these levels.

  4. Yeah, I could tell it was fake in just a few moments. When the guy fell without being shot I was suspicious, but gave it the benefit of the doubt, as he could have been “faking” to protect himself (off chance, I know) but when I saw that there was NO blood spray, puddles, splatter, and a person get shot point blank in the head with NO physical damage visible (her head should have come apart at that range) PLUS the way that one was laying (Stiff, hands folded over the chest in a “coffin” pose- People dont die like that, they are POSED like that in a morgue, dumb crisis actor…) AND when I noticed that supposedly bullets could go through the window, turn 180 degrees to seek its targets (the magic bullet that got Kennedy has NOTHING on that spray) I knew this was bullshit. And we ALL know who is behind this garbage….

    But I dont think they CARE how fake it looks, so long as enough stupid people fall for it. Not to mention many people who WANT this to be true. Its sickening.

    But this one was SO SLOPPY that in the right hands, I believe this video could finally expose them for pulling these fake events and have them held accountable. Depending on what TRUE patriots do about this, especially low-mid level politicians or authority figures) this will either be same lie, different day, or a real turning point.

    Enough with the lies.

  5. There are already women lying on the ground (it looks like 2), in plain sight, when he enters the store, and he has yet to fire a shot inside the store — ? — some may say they were hit when he shot thru the window into the store, but if you pay attention to the construction of the store as he’s walking in, you see that is not possible — those two women are well to the left of where he shot into the window, and behind a wall — very strange.

    And for an alleged ‘white supremacist’, the first woman he shoots looks white.

  6. While some of this certainly looks fake, and there seems to be a lack of blood, bullet holes appear in the store window. Also, dust appears to becoming from the wall behind the people standing outside the door.

  7. The gun man looks just like the Uvalde gun man. Now when they show him handcuffed he is a Sandy blonde headed guy. Weird!

Leave a Comment