A randomized study published by the highly respected Dr. Peter Aaby found that the Diphtheria–Tetanus–Pertussis (DTP) vaccine caused children to die at a higher rate than unvaccinated children. By the way, Dr. Aaby is not against vaccinations. Indeed, he promotes vaccinations. Yet he concluded that the DTP vaccine is killing children. Aaron Siri explains that Dr. Aaby is a long-time promoter of vaccines:
Dr. Aaby is renowned for studying and promoting vaccines in Africa with over 300 published studies. … Among his accolades, in 2000, Dr. Aaby was awarded the Novo Nordisk Prize, the most important Danish award within health research, and in 2009, the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs selected Dr. Aaby as a leader in the fight against global poverty.
The conclusion of Dr. Aaby’s study was that “[a]lthough having better nutritional status and being protected against three infections, 6–35 months old DTP-vaccinated children tended to have higher mortality than DTP-unvaccinated children. All studies of the introduction of DTP have found increased overall mortality.”
Other studies have shown that the mortality rate for DTP-vaccinated children is two (2) times greater than for unvaccinated children. Dr. Aaby explains that “[a]ll studies that documented vaccination status and followed children prospectively indicate that DTP has negative effects; a meta-analysis of the eight studies found 2-fold higher mortality for DTP-vaccinated compared with DTP-unvaccinated.”
Doubling the mortality rate is bad enough, but that is not the whole story. The studies referenced by Dr. Aaby were biased in favor of the vaccinated group because the vaccinated groups were healthier babies. Dr. Aaby explains that “the ‘unvaccinated’ control children in previous studies having been a frail subgroup, too frail to get vaccinated.” Thus, the unvaccinated babies did not receive the DTP vaccine because the doctors determined they were too frail and unhealthy to tolerate a vaccination. But when the study measured babies of similar health, the detrimental effect of the DTP vaccine is revealed in all its horror. Dr. Aaby reveals that “DTP [vaccination] was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated.”
That is bad enough, but it gets worse. You see, the unvaccinated group cited by Dr. Aaby in his conclusion simply means unvaccinated with DTP. The “unvaccinated” babies in that group had, in fact, been vaccinated with the oral polio vaccine (OPV). When the children that received the OPV are excluded from the unvaccinated group, the mortality rate for children receiving a DTP vaccine skyrockets to ten (10) times that for children receiving no vaccination. That suggests that there is also an increase in mortality due to the OPV.
When isolating only the DTP-vaccinated children and comparing them to the truly unvaccinated children, the simple conclusion is that vaccinating a child with the DTP vaccination increases his chances of dying in the first 6 months of his life by ten (10) fold.
Dr. Aaby concluded that “[a]ll currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease, it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.” Many countries, including the U.S., replaced The DTP vaccine with the DTaP vaccine long ago. The ‘a’ stands for ‘acellular’ pertussis.
The newer DTaP vaccine is alleged to be somewhat safer than the DTP vaccine, but it is just as ineffective as the DTP vaccine. A 2014 study proved that the DTaP vaccine is ineffective. The study examined the effectiveness of the DTaP vaccine in preventing the 2012 Wisconsin pertussis outbreak. Researchers determined that the efficacy of the vaccine quickly waned. For example, only 11.9% of the children who had received the DTaP vaccine in 2008 and 2009 were protected from getting pertussis during the 2012 Wisconsin pertussis outbreak. Mathematician Igor Chudov reviewed the statistics in the study and concluded that the protection afforded by the DTaP vaccine was effectively zero four years after vaccination. The DTaP vaccine is worthless. Yet, governments and doctors falsely promote the DTaP vaccine as safe and effective.
The DTP vaccine is still being administered in about 40 countries worldwide. What informed parent would agree to vaccinate their child with the DTP vaccine? Indeed, why would any informed parent allow their child to be inoculated with any vaccine?
The above 2018 study by Dr. Aaby confirmed the results of a prior 2017 study he did showing the deadliness of the DTP vaccine. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) and the Vaccine Science Foundation (VSF) informed the UN about Dr. Aaby’s 2017 study showing the deadliness of the DTP vaccines. Yet, with that knowledge, the UN continued to fund and promote the DTP vaccines. ICAN again implored the UN to stop the DTP program after Dr. Aaby’s 2018 study was published. Yet the UN continued to promote and fund DTP vaccinations, knowing that the vaccine was killing children.
Attorney Aaron Siri sent a letter on January 28, 2021, on behalf of the ICAN to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. In that letter, Siri called out UNICEF for funding and promoting the DTP vaccine while knowing that the vaccine is killing children. It seems that the UNICEF vaccine program killing children is quite profitable. Siri reveals in his letter that “in 2019 alone, UNICEF purchased over $1.656 billions of vaccine products from these companies and spent an equally significant sum paying companies for their distribution, in total amounting to over a third of UNICEF’s budget.” As shocking as it may sound to read, it is a fact that high officials are knowingly killing children for profit through vaccination. Siri challenged the UN to stop killing children through the DTP vaccine program.
The seminal study regarding DTP and mortality found that children receiving this product during the first six months of life died at 10 times the rate when compared to children that did not receive this product. Despite this, and many similar studies, the United Nations Children’s Fund (“UNICEF”), continues to purchase, promote, and distribute DTP to developing and underdeveloped countries, and pushes its use on every newborn child long after knowing that the clear dangers it poses caused developed nations to stop using DTP decades ago. … UNICEF has and continues to be instrumental and the central worldwide actor in the purchase, promotion and distribution of DTP in many developing countries. UNICEF has continued this conduct despite the clear evidence that it increases mortality and despite the fact that DTP has not been subjected to a single randomized placebo-controlled trial to prove its safety.
Infant Deaths Went Down During COVID Lockdown Because Children Were NOT Being Vaccinated
Mark Blaxill and Amy Becker studied mortality rates during the COVID-19 lock-downs. They discovered a startling fact. Infant mortality actually went down during the lockdown. There was a significant decrease in the number of infant deaths. Blaxill and Becker attributed that drop to the inability of parents to do well-baby doctor checkups with the obligatory vaccinations. Fewer vaccines = fewer infant deaths. Blaxill and Becker stated:
Starting in early March, expected deaths [for children under 18 years old] began a sharp decline, from an expected level of around 700 deaths per week to well under 500 by mid-April and throughout May. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics Mortality Surveillance System.
As untimely deaths spiked among the elderly in Manhattan nursing homes and in similar settings all over the country, something mysterious was saving the lives of children. As springtime in America came along with massive disruptions in family life amid near-universal lockdowns, roughly 30% fewer children died.
Was this a protective effect of school closures? Were teenagers getting themselves into risky situations at a lower rate? No. There was very little effect among school age children or adolescents.
Incidentally, since the publication of Blaxill and Becker’s article, the CDC has removed the page that memorialized the fact that almost all of the reduction in childhood deaths came from infants. Blaxill and Becker explain that the CDC statistics showed:
Virtually the entire change came from infants. Somehow, the changing pattern of American life during the lockdowns has been saving the lives of hundreds of infants, over 200 per week.
What has changed during this period that might have such an effect?
One very clear change that has received publicity is that public health officials are bemoaning the sharp decline in infant vaccinations as parents are not taking their infants into pediatric offices for their regular well-baby checks. In the May 15  issue of the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a group of authors from the CDC and Kaiser Permanente reported a sharp decline in provider orders for vaccines as well as a decline in pediatric vaccine doses administered. Santoli, Jeanne M et al. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Routine Pediatric Vaccine Ordering and Administration — United States, 2020. cdc.gov. [Online] May 15, 2020. These declines began in early March, around the time infant deaths began declining.