Can the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine be Spread To the Unvaccinated Through Skin Contact or Inhalation?

Dr. Steven Baker, D.C., announced that he is not accepting patients who have received one of the COVID-19 injections due to concerns of transmission affecting those who have not received the shots, particularly pregnant patients.
 

Dr. Ariyana Love Explains:

There have been doctors, experts and industry insiders such as Dr. Michael yeadon and Geert Vanden Bossche who’ve been blowing the whistle and warning us of viral shedding from the vaxxed that could infect the healthy. Indeed, people who come in contact with someone who has been vaxxed with the experimental medical devices but who have not been vaxxed themselves, are developing Covid-19 symptoms, including blood clotting, bleeding, miscarriages, rashes and more.

When analyzed further, Dr. Christiane Northrop explains that the “shedding from a vaccine is very different from what we are witnessing with the Covid-19 shot”. Shedding is a natural occurrence from vaccinations but since Covid-19 is not a vaccine, we need to think not in terms of shedding but in terms of transmission.

The environmental spread of the mRNA vaccine through the skin or inhalation is real and the pharmaceutical companies have acknowledged it as a risk to be measured and reported.
 
This is a quote from pages 67-68 of the Pfizer phase 1/2/3/ studies
 
“8.3.5.1 Exposure During Pregnancy

An EDP occurs if:
 
***
 
“A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention [i.e., mRNA vaccine] due to environmental exposure. Below are examples ofenvironmental exposure during pregnancy: 
“• A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
 
***
 
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE [serious adverse event] has occurred.
 
There is anecdotal evidence of “hundreds of accounts from women reporting irregular bleeding after either having the Covid vaccine or being in the company of those who’ve had the Covid vaccine.” That certainly indicates that there is is shedding of the contaminants in the vaccine to unvaccinated persons.
 
The spread of the mRNA in the vaccine or the mRNA-generated spike protein is not the same as the spread of COVID-19. But the “shedding” from a vaccinated person is often reported not as the spread of the vaccine’s mRNA or the mRNA generated spike protein but rather the spread of COVID-19 from the vaccinated population to the unvaccinated population. For example, Prof. Dr. Günter Kampf, University Medicine Greifswald, Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicinein published an article in the Lancet, wherein he reported that there is “clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission.”
 
What should be investigated is whether those infected with the mRNA vaccine are spreading the vaccine’s mRNA or the cell-generated spike protein to others.
 
The allegation that COVID-19 mRNA-vaccinated persons are shedding their vaccine to others is contested by FactCheck.org. But please be mindful that FactCheck.org is funded by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. The Annenberg Public Policy Center is affiliated with the Annenberg Institute at Brown University which the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation partly funds. Indeed, in 2021 alone the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated $999,260 to the Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
 
 
It seems that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sees the Annenberg Foundation as an ally in its “charitable” goals, which necessarily includes the promotion of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Needless to say, FactCheck.org has at least a million ($) reasons to refute the claim that mRNA vaccine recipients are spreading their contagion to others. FactCheck.org has a dog in the fight and cannot be considered unbiased.

1 thought on “Can the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine be Spread To the Unvaccinated Through Skin Contact or Inhalation?

  1. I am concerned about what is going on in Australia. The New South Wales government has paid a large fee to an MRNA company to develop a vaccine to prevent foot and mouth and lumpy skin disease in cattle (even though no foot and mouth disease currently exists in Australia). They have requested a vaccine be ready to inject into cows by August the first 2023. This concerns me, I believe it it immoral for any government or individual to inject another species with this product which has not been fully proven as safe in the human population as evidence mounts that it is the complete opposite. The damage to the cattle industry could be huge (and we all remember the “mad cow disease burger comments on the Oprah tv show and its effects on meat sales in America”). I think people would seek to avoid consuming beef and its associated dairy products if this happens in Australia and it could devastate the country’s export industry. Let’s face it, this is a new low for these morons pushing these in my opinion “toxic and deadly poisons”!. So my message to the New South Wales government is keep your filthy poison out of the food chain!.

Leave a Comment