Please understand the significance of that occurrence because Rep. Lynch is not the only person to have tested positive for COVID-19 after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. There has been a slew of such reports. It seems to have become the norm. The COVID-19 vaccine is supposed to prevent someone from getting COVID-19. The whole purpose of the COVID-19 vaccine is to prevent the COVID-19 infection. Indeed, that was the primary focus of the study that resulted in the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA for the Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccines.
When you read page 28 of the Pfizer-BioNtech publication titled FACT SHEET FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS ADMINISTERING VACCINE, it reveals that the only criterion reported for establishing the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine is the subsequent infection rate in the study groups. The study compared the COVID-19 infection rate among the vaccine group and compared it with the infection rate in the placebo group to come up with an effectiveness of 95% for the COVID-19 vaccine. The study announced that the “Vaccine Efficacy” was based upon a finding of the “First COVID-19 Occurrence From 7 Days After Dose 2.”
The 95% effectiveness rate is misleading. I address that in another blog article regarding the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer-BioNtech used precisely the same deception as did Moderna when announcing its misleading 95% of effectiveness.
But The Daily Mail article announces that the reason that Rep. Lynch was infected with COVID-19 after being vaccinated is that “Pfizer’s vaccine does not necessarily prevent COVID-19 infection, but is said to be 95 percent effective in stopping the serious symptoms that are caused by the coronavirus.”
That is a lie. Pfizer-BioNtech announced that their COVID-19 vaccine was 95% effective in “preventing” COVID-19. They did NOT announce that it was 95% effective in reducing symptoms of COVID-19.
The reason that the FDA allowed the EUA of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was that the COVID-19 vaccine study claimed a 95% effectiveness in “preventing” the recipient from getting COVID-19 after they had been vaccinated. Indeed, the FDA states the reason for the EUA of the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine was that it is theorized to be effective in “preventing” the COVID-19 infection.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is authorized to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older.
Remember, the Pfizer-BioNtech has not been approved by the FDA as being safe and effective. The FDA states:
The FDA only states that the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine “may” prevent COVID-19. By the way, the FDA has made the same statements about the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. The FDA only hopes that the COVID-19 vaccines will prevent COVID-19.
The COVID-19 vaccines are only “authorized” under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to be used because the alleged benefits outweigh any potential dangers. Neither the Moderna nor the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in preventing COVID-19. The FDA has stated clearly that there is no proof that the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine will be effective they just “hope” that is the case. Read it for yourself:
Most vaccines that protect from viral illnesses also reduce transmission of the virus that causes the disease by those who are vaccinated. While it is hoped this will be the case, the scientific community does not yet know if the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine will reduce such transmission.
If a person who has been vaccinated can be infected, then that infected person can pass on that infection. At least that is the present germ theory. Discussion of the terrain theory is beyond the scope of our discussion here, but be aware there is a growing plurality of doctors who ascribe to it. The “hope” of the scientific community that the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine will stop transmission has been unrealized. The vaccine has now been shown to be ineffective by standards announced by Pfizer-BioNtech and the FDA.
The evidence now is that the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine is ineffective in preventing COVID-19. The FDA and Pfizer-BioNteck warned about this eventuality. The Pfizer-BioNtech fact sheet admits that their vaccine may not protect “everyone.”
What they meant to say, but would not say, is that their vaccine may not protect anyone.
And so now that their COVID-19 vaccine has been shown not to protect anyone from getting COVID-19, Pfizer-BioNtech wants to change the standard for effectiveness from preventing the disease to lessening the symptoms of the disease.
The problem with this new criterion for effectiveness is that it was never studied. If it has now been shown that the vaccine is truly ineffective in “preventing” a vaccine recipient from getting COVID-19 it should be announced as ineffective. The vaccine should be taken off the market. Apparently, that will not happen. Instead, there is now being announced a new criterion for effectiveness that was never studied. And that new criteria is lessening of symptoms.
That is a problem because the FDA has stated that the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine has been authorized under the EUA in the hope that it will “prevent” COVID-19 and NOT in the hope it will reduce the severity of COVID-19.
To date, only a small number of severe cases have occurred during the study, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether the vaccine reduces the severity of COVID-19. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is authorized to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older.
This bait and switch from preventing infection to lessening symptoms, it seems, was the plan all along. On October 28, 2020, before either the Modern or the Pfizer-BioNtch vaccines were granted EUA by the FDA, Anthony Fauci stated that the “The primary thing you want to do is that if people get infected, prevent them from getting sick.” Fauci explained that reducing symptoms of COVID-19 was the “primary endpoint” of the vaccines. Fauci said that getting rid of the virus through immunity was only a “secondary endpoint.” His argument was that “with reduced severe symptoms, the coronavirus would pose a lower threat as a pandemic. Then scientists could focus on developing a solution that would reach the full goal of preventing initial infection.”
“If the vaccine also allows you to prevent initial infection that would be great,” [Fauci] said. “But what I would settle for, and all my colleagues would settle for, is the primary endpoint, which is to prevent clinically recognizable disease. That’s what we hope happens.”
He and his colleagues viewed reducing symptoms of COVID-19 as the primary endpoint of the vaccines. They hoped the vaccines would also prevent COVID-19 but he (and his colleagues) did NOT view that as the primary endpoint. Of course, his colleagues included the scientists at the FDA and those employed by the vaccine makers.
That is the opposite of what the FDA and the drug companies said in their publications. The FDA said that the COVID-19 vaccines are being “authorized to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).” They are NOT being authorized to reduce symptoms of COVID-19 because it is “difficult to evaluate whether the vaccine reduces the severity of COVID-19.”
Anthony S. Fauci is the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He is in charge of the federal response to the Covid-19 threat. He had the inside information about the proposed COVID-19 vaccines. He knew at the outset that the COVID-19 vaccines in development would NOT prevent the infection of COVID-19.
While the drug companies were seeking approval for their COVID-19 vaccines to “prevent” the COVID-19 infection and its spread. Fauci’s statements prior to the EUA reveals that the vaccine makers and the FDA knew that their vaccines would not accomplish the goal of preventing COVID-19.
The bait-and-switch was planned ahead of time. They presented evidence of efficacy that falsely showed that their COVID-19 vaccine was effective in “preventing” COVID-19, knowing all along that those results were invalid. The studies were rigged to obtain the EUA.
Now that the vaccines have been shown not to prevent COVID-19, the vaccine makers are embarking on their pre-planned new justification for vaccination against COVID-19: to reduce the symptoms of COVID-19. The problem is that was not the basis for the EUA. Thus, that should not be the basis for continuing under the EUA. The ineffective and dangerous vaccines should be withdrawn from the market immediately.
But the U.S. Government does not care. The FDA is in the back pocket of the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical companies do not have to make safe vaccines because with immunity from liability granted to them by the government they have no economic incentive to do so. Since they control the government customer who buys their ineffective vaccines and the government will buy them no matter whether they are effective, the pharmaceutical companies have no incentive to ensure their vaccines are effective. All of this skulduggery is happening while the pharmaceutical companies control the mainstream media, thus ensuring that the public knows none of this.
So, when the COVID-19 vaccine is shown to be ineffective, the pharmaceutical companies just change the rules for what it means to be effective. The lapdogs in the mainstream media go along with their masters and deceptively report that “Pfizer’s vaccine does not necessarily prevent COVID-19 infection, but is said to be 95 percent effective in stopping the serious symptoms that are caused by the coronavirus.”
That is what George Orwell described as “Newspeak” in his dystopian novel, “1984.”
The one silver lining in this dystopian cloud is that because the COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent COVID-19 infection, and thus they also cannot stop the alleged spread of COVID-19, there is no scientific justification for tyrannical governments to force their people to be injected with a COVID-19 vaccine.