I previously showed what appeared to be computer-generated imagery (CGI) in the video of the Punta Arenas sunrise posted by Will Duffy. One of several examples, involved frames showing a car passing in front of a pole that is between the camera and the vehicle. That is impossible in real life. I have placed yellow lines on either side of the pole to make it more clear what is happening.
I spoke with expert videographers. It is not clear to them what caused the car to pass in front of the pole. They theorized that it could be a result of increasing the frame rate that caused frames to be added to smooth the video. That means that what we see in the video has been altered by software that added frames to the video. The added frames are computer-generated imagery (CGI) that incorrectly rendered the parallax of the car with the pole. Thus, what was depicted on screen has been altered. That is obvious because we cannot have a vehicle passing in front of a pole that it is passing behind. The experts opined that it is not the result of video compression, but it could be the result of video expansion where frames are added by a computer program to increase the frame rate to smooth out the video.
The Punta Arenas video depicted the sun rising in the southeast. Will Duffy presented the video as evidence that the earth is a sphere and that the sun continued to pass in a circle to the south of Punta Arenas. While his argument is logical, it is not proof the earth is a spinning globe. Indeed, the earth is flat and stationary. It is for that reason that The Final Experiment group needed to create CGI videos falsely portraying a 24-hour sun in Antarctica.
The southeast-rising sun in Punta Arenas is not enough. Proof of Duffy’s claim that the earth is a spinning globe would require a video of a 24-hour sun in Antarctica. And that is what Duffy set out to do. But the evidence is that the 24-hour sun The Final Experiment showed in their Antarctica videos is fake. The issue is not whether the sun rises in the southeast in Punta Arenas; the issue is whether the sun travels in a circle over a spherical earth. The anomalous CGI in the Punta Arenas raises the issue of whether the videos supposedly showing a 24-hour sun in Antarctica have been altered by CGI.
The Punta Arenas video was presented as a 4k depiction of the sunrise in the Punta Arenas. But the still frames show that the video has been altered. What the experts I consulted could not say is that it was done purposely to deceive. That means I overstated the case by alleging that the alteration of the Punta Arenas sunrise video was proof that it was done to purposely deceive. I have since deleted the post and the video that made that allegation. But I maintain that the depiction of a 24-hour sun in Antarctica is fake and done to purposely deceive. While I overstated the intent behind the Punta Arenas video, the CGI in that video enhances my argument that CCI was used by The Final Experiment group in Antarctica.
Thus, the larger issue remains. Proof that the Punta Arenas video was altered with CGI calls into question the authenticity of the other Final Experiment videos. The same video engineers who created the Punta Arenas video also created the Antarctica 24-hour sun videos. The Punta Arenas video was presented to show what was happening, and the experts I consulted with have opined that CGI frames were added by software. The added frames depicted something that did not actually happen. You can imagine the mischief that can be done with software that is capable of adding frames to a video to depict something that did not occur, like a 24-hour sun in Antarctica.
The video alteration in the Punta Arenas video was subtle and almost imperceptible. The video showed something that could not have actually occurred: the car passing in front of a pole when it is, in fact, behind the pole. Thus, the alteration was detected. But what about other videos where the alteration is made by programming the software to depict something more realistic, like a 24-hour sun in Antarctica? It would be a matter of programming software to present a fake 24-hour sun in Antarctica, where there is no actual 24-hour sun. Below are links to articles presenting evidence that the alleged 24-hour sun in Antarctica depicted in The Final Experiment videos is a CGI hoax.
The day is quickly approaching where video ‘proof’ will no longer be a credible source, as AI generated videos are becoming easier to do and the AI is ‘learning’ and getting better. Setting up simple parameters and having it generate what they want to present as proof of their lie will only further separate those who know and the sheep who cannot understand it doesn’t take billions of people to lie about the flat earth. Their use of fear of being labeled a kook, conspiracy theorist, or mental case works wonders. We were all taught about the spinning blue marble in school at an early age and it has taken some of us decades to undo that programming. The masses who don’t want there to be a mighty God and creator they are accountable to will eat up the fakery they are being fed so they can justify their sinful nature.