Hydroxychloroquine is Safe and Effective
Below is a video of the Charlie Kirk Show posted on July 30, 2020, where Kirk interviews nine (9) doctors with more than 200 years of combined medical experience. They all make the point that hydroxychloroquine is a safe and effective cure for the flu-like illness that has been described as COVID-19.
The YouTube video of the July 30, 2020, Charlie Kirk Show with the nine doctors revealing the benefits of hydroxychloroquine, was located at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cR3O_82yP6o . That video was deleted by YouTube on or before August 10, 2020, with the following notice: “This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines.” Google, who owns YouTube, will stop at nothing to keep this important information hidden from the public.
YouTube cannot claim medical expertise that exceeds the 200 years of medical experience represented by the nine doctors in the video. No, this has nothing to do with the merits of the video. This was purely a powerplay in shutting down a disfavored remedy that undermines the vaccine and patent medicine profits of the drug companies from whom Google receives massive advertising revenues. YouTube is simply the piper obeying the dictates of the pharmaceutical companies, who, by virtue of paying that piper, get to call the tune.
But the video was backed up on BitChute, and it can be viewed below.
Many of the doctors on the Charlie Kirk Show had attended a previously held a press conference on July 27, 2020, extolling the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine.
After receiving millions of views in the first day, the video was taken down and scrubbed from the internet. Jon Passantino and Oliver Darcy from CNN, of course, described the information from the doctors as “false and dubious claims.” Passantino and Oliver stated:
A video featuring a group of doctors making false and dubious claims related to the coronavirus was removed by Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube after going viral online Monday.
The Nefarious Motive Behind the Attack on Hydroxychloroquine Revealed by Dr. Simone Gold
Fraudulent Report Attacking Hydroxychloroquine
Passino and Oliver also stated that the claim that “recent studies showing hydroxychloroquine is ineffective for the treatment of the flu-like illness known as Covid-19 are ‘fake science’ sponsored by ‘fake pharma companies’” was a dubious claim made by the assembled doctors. In fact, it turns out that the study the doctors claimed was fake was in fact fake. The fake study was published in The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine and made the claim that hydroxychloroquine was unsafe and ineffective. The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine are the top two most respected medical journals in the world. The study published by those two journals was exposed as based upon fabricated data and performed by a false-front company.
A search of publicly available material suggests several of Surgisphere’s employees have little or no data or scientific background. An employee listed as a science editor appears to be a science fiction author and fantasy artist whose professional profile suggests writing is her fulltime job. Another employee listed as a marketing executive is an adult model and events hostess, who also acts in videos for organisations.
The discovery that the study was completely made up from fabricated data forced The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) to retract their publication of the study. The odd thing is that it only took a modicum of review to discover the fraud. That is something that could easily have been done by the editors of The Lancet and the NEJM.
The article had the effect of halting all studies by the World Health Organization (WHO) into the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine. The WHO has not restarted those studies since the study was shown to be fraudulent.
Many governors in the United States prohibited the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 based upon that fraudulent study. Those governors have not retracted their prohibitions on the use of hydroxychloroquine.
What is amazing is that the study was announced by the NEJM as being retracted not because the data was shown to be fabricated (which it was), but rather “because all the authors were not granted access to the raw data and the raw data could not be made available to a third-party auditor, we are unable to validate the primary data sources underlying our article.”
Hugh? The article was a complete fraud. It should be announced as such. But, instead, it was announced as being retracted because the data could not be verified. That is how the NEJM rolls.
What did The Lancet say? In much the same way as the NEJM, The Lancet stated that “our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review and therefore [the authors] notified us of their withdrawal from the peer-review process.”
Both The Lancet and the NEJM rushed a fraudulent study to press without adequate peer review and a shocking lack of due diligence because it supported the narrative that hydroxychloroquine was unsafe and ineffective. Indeed, a typical medical study sometimes takes years to get through the peer-review process for publication. But this article was seemingly not reviewed at all. Why would the world-renowned NEJM and The Lancet publish garbage? That was answered by Dr. Douste-Blazy, who spilled the beans and revealed the control of pharmaceutical companies over The Lancet and NEJM.
Philippe Douste-Blazy, MD, is a cardiologist and former French Health Minister who served as Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations. He was a candidate in 2017 for the Director of the World Health Organization.
Vera Sharav reported in the Alliance for Human Research Protection the following information from Dr. Douste-Blazy:
In a videotaped interview on May 24, 2020, Dr. Douste-Blazy provided insight into how a series of negative hydroxychloroquine studies got published in prestigious medical journals.
He revealed that at a recent Chatham House top secret, closed door meeting attended by experts only, the editors of both The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine expressed their exasperation, citing the pressures put on them by pharmaceutical companies.
He states that each of the editors used the word “criminal” to describe the erosion of science. (emphasis added)
He who pays the piper calls the tune. Digging further we find that the fraudulent study itself was financed by a pharmaceutical company that is trying to market a substitute for hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. Sharav reveals:
Dr. Mandeep Mehra, the lead co-author [of the fraudulent article] is a director at Brigham & Women’s Hospital, which is credited with funding the study. Dr. Mehra and The Lancet failed to disclose that Brigham Hospital has a partnership with Gilead and is currently conducting TWO trials testing Remdesivir, the prime competitor of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, the focus of the study.
Sharav explains that within days of the study being published “Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) declared on CNN “The scientific data is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy.”
And right on cue, there was a media blitz against hydroxychloroquine. Sharav reports:
A media blitz against hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) created panic: clinical trials aimed at testing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 were suspended by International public health institutions including the World Health Organization the UK government regulatory agency and the French government.
WHY are very powerful corporate-government stakeholders so intent on killing a drug with a 70 year track record? Because the drug works against the pandemic; it is readily available, and costs very little. Therefore, it poses a financial threat to both pharma companies and their partners in government and academia, those who are intent on profiting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
As uncovered by Science Defies Politics: 16 of the panel members selected by NIH to formulate the official COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines – including two of the three co-chairs – were paid by Gilead. They issued guidelines that raised fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the use of HCQ combined with AZ, while raising no fear, doubt, or uncertainty about using Gilead’s unproven, unapproved, drug remdesivir; a drug that has shown mediocre performance in clinical trials. Seven of the NIH panelists failed to disclose their financial ties to Gilead. They are listed here.
The medical scientific literature is infested with financially motivated, shoddy, studies aimed at promoting products and, when a life-saving, non-patentable product, proves effective, scientists are hired to author study reports that are designed to tarnish scientists’ reputations, and to proclaim findings that refute legitimate findings. In this case, studies designed to “debunk” the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19.
Examples of countries and physicians who have witnessed the effectiveness of the HCQ – Az combination as a treatment for covid-19, are viewed by corporate-government collaborating partners as posing a major threat to their marketing agendas.
Full Court Press to Censor Doctors Who Advocate For HydroxyChloroquine
The nine doctors on Charlie Kirk show who were promoting the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine posted the research supporting their claims for the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine on a website at: www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com . But within days of their announcement of that resource website, their webhost, Squarespace, shut down the website. Christopher Zara reported for Fast Company:
But after news of the video spread on Tuesday, the website suddenly became unreachable. Squarespace, which hosts the website, now presents visitors with a message saying it has “expired.”
The doctors who are part of a larger organization called America’s Frontline Doctors were forced to set up a new website at:
One of the doctors on the Charlie Kirk Show revealed the astounding truth that “doctors can’t freely speak by the way. So many doctors have, I mean, thousands have come to me and said I work for such and such institution if I speak out, I’ve heard many doctors say I would be fired instantly.”
This is censorship on a massive scale to keep the public ignorant about a cure for the flu-like illness known as COVID-19. Why? Because there are very powerful pharmaceutical interests that are pushing for patent medicines and vaccinations to treat COVID-19.
Keeping HCQ From the Public Has Killed More Than 120,000 People
Former University President Everett Piper has stated in an August 10, 2020, Washington Times article that the effort by governors, in particular, Governors Andrew Cuomo of New York, Gavin Newsom of California, and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, the CDC, the mainstream media, and media-tech companies to keep Hydroxychloroquine and information about HCQ from people as a treatment for COVID-19 has resulted in the deaths of more than 120,000 people in the United States.
On July 23, 2020, the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS) provided the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration copious amounts of data showing, among other things, that countries using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are attaining far lower mortality rates than the United States. “The mortality rate from COVID-19 in countries that allow access to HCQ,” said the AAPS, “is only one-tenth the mortality rate of countries where there is interference with this medication, such as the United States.”
the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, which recently published a study involving thousands of patients where HCQ proved to be both very safe and highly effective in treating COVID-19. This study reports reducing mortality by 50%. Did you catch that? Fifty percent.
the Palmer Foundation report published last week highlighting the Indian slum of Dharavi. This is Asia’s biggest and densest slum, housing more than a million people. In the early days of the pandemic, Dharavi suffered a cluster outbreak. Doctors report containing it by using proactive measures, “including the use of hydroxychloroquine for prophylaxis (preventive) treatment.” As a result, Dharavi’s COVID-19 infection rate dropped drastically from April through June, and in July, new infections were very low, almost reaching zero on July 9.”
Yes, you read that correctly. “Almost reaching zero.”
Harvey, A. Risch, MD, Ph.D., professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health (generally not known as a bastion of conservative political thought), who recently wrote in Newsweek magazine: “I am … flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily.”
Yes, you read that correctly. “Tens of thousands of patients are dying unnecessarily.”
Dr. Risch then goes on to cite study after study showing the efficacy of HCQ. There is a study involving 400 high-risk patients treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, with zero deaths. There are four studies totaling almost 500 high-risk patients treated in nursing homes and clinics across the U.S., with no deaths. There is a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil, with significantly reduced hospitalization and two deaths among 334 patients.
There is another study of 398 matched patients in France, also with significantly reduced hospitalization. And there is the reverse natural experiment in Switzerland where on May 27 the Swiss national government banned outpatient use of hydroxychloroquine. By June 10, COVID-19 deaths had increased four-fold and remained elevated. On June 11, the Swiss government revoked the ban, and on June 23, the death rate reverted to what it had been beforehand.
Exosome Theory vs. Virus Theory
Incidentally, COVID-19 is an acronym that stands for “coronavirus disease 2019. There are many strains of coronavirus and they are theorized to cause cold and flu-like symptoms. An objective view of the evidence reveals that COVID-19 is no more dangerous than ordinary flu. Carl Robers succinctly explains that “[t]here is a cure for COVID-19 alright. And its called discernment. Covid19 is a hoax.”
Roberts’ statement is not just a polemic. The virus theory is only a working theory that has been accepted by the scientific community at large. There is a competing theory supported by a plurality of doctors and scientists called the exosome theory. Under the exosome theory, what are called viruses (including the coronavirus) are not actually viruses but rather exosomes, which are created by the body to fight disease. Exosomes are beneficial and not contagious.
The following video about exosome theory vs. virus theory (a.k.a., terrain theory vs. germ theory) was deleted from YouTube, but I was able to find it on BitChute, and it can be seen below.