The Alleged COVID-19 “Virus” Has Never Been Isolated


Please understand that the reported infections for COVID-19 among both unvaccinated and vaccinated persons are based on tests that are returning false-positive results. A little known fact is that the alleged COVID-19 virus has never been isolated. The alleged COVID-19 virus has never been proven even to exist. Claims by governments and researchers to the contrary are simply false; they try to redefine what it means to isolate a virus and use obfuscatory language to conceal the deception.

In reality, there is not a single study of the alleged COVID-19 (a.k.a., SARS-CoV2) virus that has isolated or purified it. 1 That can mean only one thing. Drs. Thomas Cowan and Andrew Kaufman succinctly concluded that “[t]he SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.” 2 Christine Massey is a biostatistician. On November 30, 2021, she submitted an affidavit in a Canadian Federal Court averring that she has received responses to freedom of information (FOI) requests from Canadian and U.S. government agencies. She further stated that she had obtained records from FOI requests made by others to more than 138 institutions from 28 countries worldwide. Astoundingly, no institution was “able to cite even one record describing the isolation and purification of SARS-CoV-2 [a.k.a. COVID-9].” 3 As of August 23, 2022, that number has expanded to 208 institutions in 35 countries. Yet still, none of the institutions “have provided or cited any record describing actual ‘SARS-COV-2′ isolation/purification.” 4 The very existence of the COVID-19 virus seems to be a myth.

So, why, then are people testing positive for a non-existent COVID-19? A group of 22 highly respected scientists led by Pieter Borger, MSc, Ph.D., demanded a retraction of the report by Christian Drosten and Victor Corman that established the PCR test used worldwide for the COVID-19 virus. They cited “10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level” in the research that produced the COVID-19 PCR test. The scientists predicted that those flaws would result in false positive results. The most notable shortcoming of the research by Corman/Drosten was that the resulting COVID-19 PCR test was arrived at without isolating the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). How can one test for something that has not first been isolated? The scientists stated:


The first and major issue [with the Corman/Drosten report] is that the novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (in the publication named 2019-nCoV and in February 2020 named SARS-CoV-2 by an international consortium of virus experts) is based on in silico (theoretical) sequences, supplied by a laboratory in China, because at the time neither control material of infectious (“live”) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 nor isolated genomic RNA of the virus was available to the authors. To date no validation has been performed by the authorship based on isolated SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full length RNA thereof. According to Corman et al.:


“We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.” 5 (endnotes deleted)

The scientists concluded the obvious. A diagnostic test for COVID-19 is invalid if it is based on research without access to any actual virus material available on which to base the test.

Kary B Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, for which he won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. 6 He died suddenly in August 2019, four months before to the January 2020 publication of the Corman-Droster PCR test paper that formed the basis for the COVID-19 PCR test. Before his death, Mullis explained that with enough amplification the PCR test could be used to find almost anything. He said that “with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.” 7 For that reason, Mullis cautioned that the PCR test should not be used to diagnose whether someone is ill. Mullis said that PCR is “a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick, and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.” 8 Thus, the inventor of the PCR test is on record stating that it is improper to use a PCR test to diagnose if someone is ill or infected with a virus.

Amandha Dawn Vollmer holds a Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine degree from the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine in Toronto and a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Biotechnology. She has discovered that the test for COVID-19 is not actually testing for COVID-19. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for COVID-19 is a based on the research of German scientists Christian Drosten and Victor Corman who cobbled together the COVID-19 PCR test used worldwide to detect the COVID-19 virus. Amandha Vollmer discovered that the Corman/Drosten PCR test protocol adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) to detect COVID-19 is actually testing for chromosome 8, which is present in everyone. 9 One of the primer sequences in the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 that is promoted by the WHO is found in all human DNA. Essentially, we are the virus. That is why there is a 97% false positive rate on the COVID-19 PCR test. People are testing positive for COVID-19 because they’re human.

ctccctttgttgtgttgt = The DNA sequence for the PCR test for COVID-19. 10

ctccctttgttgtgttgt = Chromosome 8, which is present in all homo sapiens (humans). 11

The false positive error is compounded because of the high PCR threshold cycle rates employed. Each amplification level exponentially increases the likelihood of detecting the presence of chromosome 8. The PCR test amplifies the test sample as an exponent of the number of cycles. Each cycle doubles the prior cycle. For example, if you start with a penny and each day you double the amount of money you had on the previous day, at the end of 28 days (cycles) you would have more than a million dollars. If you continued to double your money each day past the 28th day, you would have more than five billion dollars after 40 days (cycles). That is the kind of amplification that the PCR test performs. The CDC has recommended 40 cycles for the PCR test. 12 And most laboratories during the alleged pandemic were performing tests using that recommended 40-cycle standard. Anthony S. Fauci is the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Dr. Fauci admitted that performing PCR tests to detect COVID-19 at 35 or more cycles will result in false-positives and the confidence in any such positive result for COVID-19 is “minuscule.” Dr. Fauci stated:


If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle… someone does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say it’s just dead nucleotides period. 13

The Portugal Court of Appeals in Lisbon agreed with the trial court, which granted a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of German tourists. The court of appeals ruled that German tourists were illegally detained by the Azores Regional Health Authority and ordered to be quarantined because the PCR test that was the basis of the detention is unreliable for detecting COVID-19. Peter Andrews reported that the Portuguese court cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” proving that the usual testing standard for a PCR test results in a COVID-19 false-positive result 97% of the time. 14

The Portugal Court of Appeals in Lisbon, based upon a study by some of the leading European and world specialists, concluded that “[t]his means that if a person has a positive PCR test at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as in most laboratories in the USA and Europe), the chances of a person being infected are less than 3%. The probability of a person receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.” 15

The antigen tests are just as inaccurate and prone to false positives. Indeed, the FDA warned unequivocally that the antigen tests are inaccurate and give false positives. “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is alerting clinical laboratory staff and health care providers that false positive results can occur with antigen tests.” 16

Indeed, the FDA has now admitted that “all tests,” for COVID-19, antigen and PCR, are inaccurate. The FDA states:


The FDA reminds clinical laboratory staff and health care providers about the risk of false positive results with all laboratory tests. Laboratories should expect some false positive results to occur even when very accurate tests are used for screening large populations with a low prevalence of infection. 17

That is why there was a push for testing asymptomatic persons. The government knew that many would falsely test positive for COVID-19. The lockdowns, social distancing, and mask mandates are all based on the premise that those with no symptoms of COVID-19 can still spread the disease. But research has proven that there is no asymptomatic transfer of COVID-19. 18 The tyrannical overlords ignore such inconvenient studies. Once persons tested positive for COVID-19, they were tallied up as COVID-19 patients. Some who are ill with the flu may test positive for COVID-19. 19 That is why the flu disappeared during the 2020-2021 flu season. 20 All persons with the flu were counted not as flu cases but as COVID-19 cases. 21 They then used the COVID-19 scam to push the poisonous COVID-19 vaccines on the population and begin the actual killing. Their objective from the beginning was to force the toxic vaccines on the world population. 22



Sally Fallon Morell, Dr. Thomas Cowan, and Dr. Andrew

Kaufman, Statement on Virus Isolation (SOVI). “SARS-CoV-2 Has Never Been Isolated or Purified”, Global Research, May 17, 2022.


Sally Fallon Morell, Dr. Thomas Cowan, and Dr. Andrew

Kaufman, Statement on Virus Isolation (SOVI). “SARS-CoV-2 Has Never Been Isolated or Purified”, Global Research, May 17, 2022.


Affidavit of Christine Massey, November 30. 2021,


Christine Massey, FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (208 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever, (last visited on September 2, 2022).


Pieter Borger, et al., Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020, November 27, 2020,


Kary B. Mullis, The Nobel Prize, (last visited on September 27, 2022).


Inventor of COVID test calls Fauci a liar, says it ‘doesn’t tell you that you’re sick’. Narural News, March 17, 2021,


Inventor of COVID test calls Fauci a liar, says it ‘doesn’t tell you that you’re sick’. Narural News, March 17, 2021,


Amandha Vollmer, PCR Tests Show Positive Because They Respond to Genetic Material Present in All Humans, G. Edward Griffin’s Need to Know, August 28, 2020,


Protocol: Real-time                                        RT-PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 Institut Pasteur,                                    Paris (last visited on September 2, 2022).


Homo sapiens chromosome 8, GRCh38.p14 Primary Assembly, (last visited on September 2, 2022).


CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Instructions for Use, at page 35, 7/21/2021,


Edward Hendrie, The PCR Test is Generating False-Positive COVID-19 Results, November 19, 2020,


Peter Andrews, Landmark Legal Ruling Finds That Covid Tests Are Not Fit for Purpose. So What Do the MSM Do? They Ignore It, RT, 27 November 2020,




Potential for False Positive Results with Antigen Tests for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 – Letter to Clinical Laboratory Staff and Health Care Providers, (last visited on September 2, 2022).


Potential for False Positive Results with Antigen Tests for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 – Letter to Clinical Laboratory Staff and Health Care Providers, (last visited on September 2, 2022).


Edward Hendrie, Authoritative Study Shows Zero Transmission of COVID-19 by Asymptomatic Carriers, December 22, 2020,


Edward Hendrie, Proof that COVID-19 Statistics are Being Padded With Influenza Cases, February 3, 2021,


Edward Hendrie, Proof that COVID-19 Statistics are Being Padded With Influenza Cases, February 3, 2021,


Edward Hendrie, Proof that COVID-19 Statistics are Being Padded With Influenza Cases, February 3, 2021,


Edward Hendrie, World Council For Health Calls for Immediate Recall of All COVID-19 Vaccines, July 30, 2022,

The Contagion Myth and Germ Theory Hoax For Dummies

Posted on August 16, 2021, by

The Satanic elite running the show behind COVID are hoping that the populace remains “dummies” with regards to the germ theory. And germs are just that – a theory. This post will be a brief expose on what I’ve learned over the past few months regarding germs and viruses and the truth about what makes us sick. Everyone needs to know this, it’s the only way we are to avoid plunging into a NEW NORMAL of medical apartheid and the loss of nearly all freedoms, assuming one wants to avoid routinely getting jabbed with a dose of poison (vaccines).

To understand how germs became such a fixed part of our culture (pun intended), let us go back to the 19th century with the birth of modern bacteriology and Robert Koch.

Koch’s Postulates, and How They Are Ignored

The Contagion Myth, a book by Dr. Tom Cowan is one of the most important and clearly written exposes on this subject post-COVID. He introduces Koch’s Postulates:

[Imagine that an inventor calls you up and says he has invented a new ping-pong ball that is able to knock down brick walls and therefore make the process of demolition much easier and safer for builders and carpenters. Sounds interesting, although it is hard to imagine how a ping-pong ball could do such a thing. You ask the inventor to show you how he has determined that the new ping-pong balls are able to destroy brick walls. His company sends you a video. The video shows them putting a ping-pong ball in a bucket of rocks and ice cubes. They then take the bucket and fling it at a small brick wall. The wall goes down—“there’s the proof,” they say.]

[Wait a minute! How do we know it was the ping-pong ball that knocked the wall down and not the rocks and ice cubes that were also in the bucket? “Good question,” the inventor replies and then sends you a video showing an animated or virtual ping-pong ball destroying a virtual brick wall. He lets you know that the ball and the wall are exact renditions of the actual ball and brick. Still, something doesn’t seem right; after all, it’s fairly easy to create a computer image or video that shows such an occurrence, yet we would all agree it has nothing to do with what might happen with the actual ball and wall.]

[The inventor is getting exasperated with all your questions, but since you are a potential investor and he is interested in having your financial support, he persists. He then sends you a detailed analysis of what makes his ping-pong ball special. It has special protrusions on the outside of the ball that “grab onto and destroy the integrity of the cement holding the bricks together.” Also, they build a lightweight internal system in the pingpong ball that, according to the inventor, leverages the power of the  ball, making it hundreds of times more powerful than the usual ping-pong ball. This, he says, is absolute proof that the new ball can whack down walls.]

[At this point, you are ready to hang up on this lunatic, but then he pulls the final trump card. He sends you videos of five esteemed researchers in the new field of ping-pong ball demolition. They, of course, have been funded entirely by the Ping-Pong Ball Demolition Council and have attained prestigious positions in the field. They each separately give testimony about the interesting qualities of this new ping-pong ball. They admit that more research is needed, but they have “presumptive” evidence that the claims of improved efficiency are correct and that a cautious investment is warranted. At that point, you do hang up the phone and check outside to see whether you’ve been dropped into Alice’s Wonderland, and whether you have just been talking to the Mad Hatter.]

[Now if this ping-pong ball can really knock down brick walls, the obvious thing to do is to take the ping-pong ball, throw it at the wall, and record what happens—then have multiple other non-invested people do the same to make sure the company didn’t put lead in the ball and throw it at a wall made of paper bricks. We could call this the Ultimate Ping-Pong Ball Test (UPPBT).]

[As bizarre and crazy as it sounds, this lack of evidence—that a microorganism called coronavirus pulls down the wall of your immune system, invades your cells, and starts replicating in them—is exactly what has happened with the “coronavirus” pandemic. No one has bothered to see what happens if you do the UPPBT, throwing the ball against the wall—and if you even suggest that we should do this, the trolls emerge from the shadows to call you a crazy person spreading “fake news.”]

[Most people would agree with the requirement of proving that the pingpong ball can destroy the brick wall; it’s not something any of us would consider negotiable.. And most people would agree that seeing a real brick wall demolished by a ping-pong ball constitutes proof. In other words, sane, rational human beings would accept the above UPPBT as true and relevant.]

Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch (1843–1910) is considered one of the founders of modern bacteriology; he created and improved laboratory technologies for isolating bacteria and also developed techniques for photographing bacteria. His research led to the creation of Koch’s postulates, a kind of UPPBT [Ultimate Ping-Pong Ball Test] for disease, which consist of four principles linking specific microorganisms to specific diseases. Koch’s postulates are as follows:

1. The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease but not found in healthy organisms.

2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in a pure culture.

3. The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.

4. The microorganism must be re-isolated from the now diseased experimental host which received the inoculation of the microorganisms and identified as identical to the original specific causative agent.

If all four conditions are met, you have proven the infectious cause for a specific set of symptoms. This is the only way to prove causation. Interestingly, even Koch could not find proof of contagion using his postulates. He abandoned the requirement of the first postulate when he discovered carriers of cholera and typhoid fever who did not get sick. In fact, bacteriologists and virologists today believe that Koch’s sensible and logical postulates “have been recognized as largely obsolete by epidemiologists since the 1950s.”

[Koch’s potulates] are not used today, and yet they are clearly the only way to prove that a germ is truly contagious.

Louis Pasteur – A Fraud

Pasteur, father of modern germ theory, ignored Koch’s Postulates in his experiments to prove contagion. Cowan writes,

“Pasteur did this type of experiment for forty years. He found sick people, claimed to have isolated a bacterium, gave the pure culture to animals—often by injecting it into their brains—and made them sick. As a result, he became the celebrity scientist of his time, feted by kings and prime ministers, and hailed as a great scientist. His work led to pasteurization, a technique responsible for destroying the integrity and health-giving properties of milk (see chapter 9). His experiments ushered in the germ theory of disease, and for over a century this radical new theory has dominated not only the practice of Western medicine, but also our cultural and economic life….

…In 1914, Professor Gerard Geison of Princeton University published an analysis of (Pasteur’s) notebooks, which revealed that Pasteur had committed massive fraud in all his studies. For instance, when he said that he injected virulent anthrax spores into vaccinated and unvaccinated animals, he could trumpet the fact that the unvaccinated animals died, but that was because he also injected the unvaccinated animals with poisons.

In the notebooks, Pasteur states unequivocally that he was unable to transfer disease with a pure culture of bacteria (he obviously wasn’t able to purify viruses at that time.) In fact, the only way he could transfer disease was to either insert the whole infected tissue into another animal (he would sometimes inject ground-up brains of an animal into the brain of another

animal to “prove” contagion) or resort to adding poisons to his culture, which he knew would cause the symptoms in the recipients.

He admitted that the whole effort to prove contagion was a failure, leading to his famous deathbed confession: “The germ is nothing; the terrain is everything.” In this case, terrain refers to the condition of the animal or person and whether the animal or person had been subject to poison.”

So to sum up, the only way he was able to make it seem like injecting a “suspect” bacteria into another organism made them sick, was by also injecting the cell culture or organism with poisons. This fails to follow the basic rule of an experiment – one variable at a time, something a 7th grader can understand. But to this day, his deception, backed by the Satanic elite, has held its ground and become common “knowledge” and the basis of pathology.

What Really Makes Us Sick

Eastern medicine, like Chinese and Ayurvedic, never speak of contagion, but simply of imbalances in the system. Western Terrain medicine too, names only four causes of all illness and disease:

  1. Poisons and toxins in our food, air, or water.
  2. Starvation (including simply poor nutrient quality in available food)
  3. An insult or injury to the tissue
  4. Psychological injury or trauma (because the psyche and emotions are more tied to physical health than most realize)

On the first point – toxins, some of these do indeed come from certain strains of bacteria. The most common example of this being food poisoning. But its not the proliferation of bacteria on the rotting food that makes you sick, its the toxins that the bacteria poop out when they eat dead or rotting flesh, which is, of course, their job in nature, as a decomposer.

And in Pasteur’s experiments with cell cultures, the only way he made it seem like bacteria were killing the cells was by either poisoning or starving the cells first. Then the bacteria did what they are programmed to do, to digest the dead, rotting cells, and poop out toxins. In the microbiome of a healthy individual, most of not all of the toxin waste produced by the bacteria is safely excreted in feces.

Here in my hometown there is a lake nearby that we are warned not to swim in or let our dogs drink from – due to “toxic” amounts of blue-green algae. However it is most likely due to a pollutant or trash dumping into the lake that made this algae proliferate and produce the toxin in the first place. Thus the algae itself is not the primal cause but only a secondary “symptom” if you will, of an imbalance in nature. The same is true for all modern diseases that appear to come from viruses or bacteria – “germs” in other words. Cholera is a good example of this. The disease is not caused, as the medical literature says, by the bacteria Vibrio cholerae, but rather this strain of bacteria eats the sewage that builds up in the drinking water of countries with poor sanitation, and the bacteria poops out toxic material. This toxic material in the drinking water is what causes cholera.

“A simple thing like strep throat,” says Dr. Kaufman, “streptococcus, which they say cause this illness, is a normal bacteria present in our body. If you did a throat culture on a hundred people without a strep throat and a hundred with strep throat you’d find a lot of positives in both groups, because streptococcus is normal to live in your throat, so how can you say it causes the disease?” More likely this strain of bacteria in those with strep throat is actually responding to the immediate cause of strep-like symptoms, say an insult or injury to the tissue, or the presence of toxins, and is actually working to eat and digest the dead tissue in the “infected” area. And what does the doctor do? He gives you antibiotics which kills the same bacteria that are working to make you better. You see how backward modern medicine has become, in many areas?

Electricity and Disease

Cowan spends some time on that book making the connections between the installation of new electronic and radio-wave technology into society and many of the major plagues that were blamed on contagious germs. Cowan writes,

“In 1836, Heinrich Schweich, author of a book on influenza, noted that all physiological processes produce electricity and theorized that an electrical disturbance of the atmosphere may prevent the body from discharging it. He repeated the then-common belief that the accumulation of electricity in the body causes the symptoms of influenza.

…These and other facts about the relationship of influenza to disturbances in electricity come from a remarkable book, The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg. Firstenberg chronicles the history of electricity in the United States and throughout the world, and the outbreaks of illness that accompanied each step toward greater electrification. The first stage involved the installation of telegraph lines; by 1875, these formed a spiderweb over the earth totaling seven hundred thousand miles, with enough copper wire to encircle the globe almost thirty times. With it came a new disease called neurasthenia. Like those suffering today from “chronic fatigue syndrome,” patients felt weak and exhausted and were unable to concentrate. They had headaches, dizziness, tinnitus, floaters in the eyes, racing pulse, pains in the heart region, and palpitations; they were depressed and had panic attacks. Dr. George Miller Beard and the medical community observed that the disease spread along the routes of railroads and telegraph lines; it often resembled the common cold or influenza and commonly seized people in the prime of life.

In 1889, we mark the beginning of the modern electrical era and also of a deadly flu pandemic, which followed the advent of electricity throughout the globe. Said Firstenberg: ‘Influenza struck explosively and unpredictably, over and over in waves until early 1894. It was as if something fundamental had changed in the atmosphere.’

…During World War I, governments on both sides of the conflict installed antennas, which eventually blanketed the earth with strong radio signals— and during the latter part of 1918, disaster struck. The Spanish flu afflicted a third of the world’s population and killed about fifty million people, more than the Black Death of the fourteenth century. To stop the contagion, communities shut down schools, businesses, and theaters; people were ordered to wear masks and refrain from shaking hands.

Those living on military bases, which bristled with antennas, were the most vulnerable. A common symptom was bleeding—from the nostrils, gums, ears, skin, stomach, intestines, uterus, kidneys, and brain. Many died of hemorrhage in the lungs, drowning in their own blood. Tests revealed a decreased ability of the blood to coagulate. Those close to death often developed ‘that peculiar blue color which seemed to mark all early fatal cases.’

Health officials were desperate to find a cause. The team of physicians from the US Public Health Service tried to infect their one hundred healthy volunteers at a naval facility on Gallops Island in Boston Harbor. A sense of frustration pervades the report, written by Milton J. Rosenau, MD, and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.10 Rosenau had built a successful career in public health by instilling a fear of germs, overseeing quarantines, and warning the public about the dangers of raw milk. He believed that something called Pfeiffer bacillus was the cause. The researchers carefully extracted throat and nasal mucus and even lung material from cadavers and transferred it to the throats, respiratory tracts, and noses of volunteers. “We used some billions of these organisms, according to our estimated counts, on each one of the volunteers, but none of them took sick,” he said.

Then they drew blood from those who were sick and injected it into ten volunteers. “None of these took sick in any way.”

So if the new technologies are to blame for mass outbreaks, why did they go away? Why didn’t Spanish flu continue to take out the entire world, since we are still, after all, blanketed in radio waves, now even worse with 5G? 5G, by the way, was introduced right around the time that COVID hit, and many of the major epicenters are near 5G towers.

The answer to this question is remarkably enough, the very particle they turned into the culprit, viruses themselves!

Viruses Are Actually Exosomes

What are viruses really, if not a contagion? As far as we can tell, they are bits of DNA or RNA, with a protein coat. This supposed strand of DNA or RNA, unique to people displaying “symptoms of COVID” has not been isolated, nor been injected into another healthy organism and made that organism sick with the same symptoms, as per Koch’s Postulates.

But as to what viruses actually do, is far different from what we’re told. First of all, they are indistinguishable from exosomes, a particle that is natural to the immune system and part of the normal immune response. From a lecture by Dr. Andrew Kaufman:

Presentation by Dr. Andrew Kaufman: Humanity is NOT a Virus - YouTube
Exosomes are indistinguishable from so-called “viruses”

Blaming exosomes for being the cause of disease is like blaming firemen for starting fires. Just because firemen are always found at the scene of a fire doesnt mean they are the guilty party. Same goes for viruses, which are actually exosomes, which are actually a sign that our immune response is working.

Some people with enough active exosomes will test positive for COVID-19, using the PCR tests. This is because those tests amplify so much cellular material that some exosomes will be a “match” for whatever it is they are looking for. And if you are following along this far, some of these false positives therefore, will display unique new symptoms like loss of smell, lung issues, as a result of the new 5G towers in their area, a bombardment of waves their body has not reached equilibrium with yet, and couple that with the toxins in the food and water, and we have a “pandemic” on our hands. No need to evoke invisible contagious germs.

But we asked previously, why didn’t previous electronic innovations continue to wipe out the human race, if they are responsible for pandemics in the past? To this, an exciting new field of science is beginning to open up, as we are discovering that the very exosomes they are blaming, are actually helping to re-equilibrate the body from disruption due to electronic frequencies. The body is able to adapt and find balance, however in the initial phase of disruption, we see a spike in death which the Illuminati attributes to contagion.

Mark Tokarski pointed out in a recent post that if viruses are real and work the way they are telling us, we would have gone extinct as a species long ago. There is nothing we can do against an invisible, deadly self-replicating enemy like that. And what did we do before the age of vaccines?! This brings up the main reason for the major psyop about viruses, which is to fix in the public’s mind the idea that science and new biotech can save them from this horrid invisible enemy, thus making them even more dependent on Big Brother.

Mark also asks the other simple obvious question which is why, if viruses are so deadly to humans, do they not kill other animals, especially mammals who are closest to us physiologically? Surely the same mechanism of action would work in their bodies. But nope, this invisible enemy sure seems to have a vendetta against humans for some reason. And if you watch V for Vendetta you will see a lot of predictive programming for the world we live in now. Hint: V is for VIRUS.

It has even been shown that exosomes can indeed pass from person to person, not to spread disease but to do the opposite: spread the new adaptive strategy to combat a new disruptive variable like EMF. We learn from each other, down to the cellular level. When two people are in love and swap a lot of spit while intimate, they are actually sharing information housed in our cells and DNA that goes through our ancestral line. Nobody really knows how this works, and we can’t study it properly until we get this ugly germ theory hoax out of the way.

There is, of course, the phenomenon of illnesses seeming to spread. For example a child brings home the flu and soon their siblings and parents get it too. Surely, you might claim, this proves germ theory. However, again, we lack the proper frame of reference to even frame our hypotheses correctly. We have just shown that viruses and bacteria are not, in themselves agents of sickness. While we share bacteria all the time with those around us, this bacteria doesn’t eat us because our bodies are alive – not rotting flesh. We have also shown that in the case of major outbreaks of plague all we need is a population exposed to the same stressors, (like toxins, EMF, etc.)

Yet sickness, or rather, a similar set of symptoms might break out in a family. But many invisible things pass from person to person – for example someone yawns in a room and soon two or three other people yawn. Something has passed, invisibly, between them, to make that urge to yawn “contagious.” So too is the phenomenon of chicken pox or flu, but in neither case do we need to posit germ particles as the enemy. It’s more likely something being exchanged in the more subtle psychic and etheric realms. And in the case of exosomes spreading, like with chicken pox, the purpose is to spread the adaptive cellular strategy, and sure enough, people who get chicken pox as children are healthier in the long run; everyone knows this. An adult who gets chicken pox is “25 times more likely to die” and this is because they were not exposed to the exosomes as a child that would have prepared them for whatever stressor really causes that set of symptoms we call “chicken pox.”

Below is an open letter to Dr. Joseph Mercola published by Christine Massey. Her letter reveals the mythology of the germ theory of illness and how so-called virologists are using pseudoscience to pull the wool over the eyes of doctors and the public regarding the COVID-19 scam. The COVID-19 “virus” has never been isolated.

Open Letter to Dr. Mercola January 17, 2022

Published January 17, 2022

Hi Dr. Mercola,

You’ve published an blog titled “Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Is a Real Virus“.

One of the sources you relied most heavily on for this claim is a recent blog by Steve Kirsch, which is really interesting because in that blog Steve admitted right off the top that he actually has no idea whether or not the alleged virus has even been isolated and that he relies on other people’s opinions.

I wrote an educational Open Letter to Steve Kirsch in response to that blog and strongly suggest you and your readers review it.

Now in your blog you state that: “SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, photographed, genetically sequenced, and exists as a pathogenic entity.

I hope we can agree that a specific thing must be known to exist in order to know that “it” is pathogenic. Not believed, imagined, assumed, or wanted to exist, but known. Because otherwise it’s impossible to establish even a correlation, let alone prove causation of anything.

Yet nowhere in your blog did you present or cite any proof that that the alleged RNA genome of 30,000 base pairs surrounded by a spikey protein shell actually exists.

I’ll briefly review some of the sources you’ve cited to explain why I say this.

You start out with a video that features Jeremy Hammond insisting that “the virus” is real, has been isolated, and is a necessary factor in “COVID-19”.

(For the record, I had an extensive email exchange with Jeremy on this topic, between October 25 and November 14, 2020. I encourage you and your readers to review it.)

In this video, Jeremy made bold claims indeed. But despite stating that the “virus” existence issue is “probably” his “biggest pet peeve“, he came to this interview armed with zero sources showing that the alleged virus does exist. In fact Jeremy cited no studies of any kind. Just unsubstantiated claims, and reliance on the beliefs of others. They could do this, they could do that. They can’t do this, they can’t do that. So-and-so says this, so-and-so says that.

Instead, Jeremy insisted that the following is the “gold standard” for “isolation” of a disease spreading “virus”: irrational and unscientific interpretation of cytopathic effects in a cell culture – typically malnourished monkey kidney cells to which toxic drugs have been added, and further contamination in the form of fetal bovine serum is added as food for the cells, along with a patient sample (not a purified sample of anything).

This, in Jeremy’s mind, establishes the existence and presence of a virus. Which is why he’d make a great virologist. Jeremy doesn’t think like a scientist, and as I always point out, “virology is not a science“.

And Jeremy lied through his teeth when he went along with the naïve (I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt) comment from his interviewer that virologists then pull “the virus” from the cell culture. “It really is that simple.” (I challenge Jeremy or you, Dr. Mercola, to cite any study where a specific thing was “pulled”, even from a monkey/cow/human mixture aka cell culture, and shown scientifically to be a disease-spreading “virus”.)

And according to Jeremy, we just “know” what “coronaviruses” look like, despite the fact that no specific thing alleged to be a “coronavirus” has ever been purified from any patient sample (or even from a cell culture) so that it could be studied logically and scientifically. Who needs science? We just know these things.

Jeremy insists that the CDC has isolated “SARS-COV-2”. Well, yes they have according to the meaningless, antiscientific approach to “isolation” used by Jeremy and virologists.

But did the CDC researchers apply even a modicum of logic or scientific method and actually establish the existence of the alleged virus? That’s an entirely different matter and the answer is a resounding “No”.

The CDC’s “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study is just another example of the typical fraudulent monkey business (literally) that plagues our world. I have addressed the CDC’s study previously, and will address this same issue of virology’s blatantly bogus “isolation” methods below.

Jeremy carried on with more bizarre claims: that scientists never isolate/purify anything, and don’t have the technology to purify things like alleged viruses.

Jeremy also strangely implied that people (such as myself) who say that proof of a disease-spreading “virus” requires purification actually demand that the alleged virus be floating in a vacuum.

Dr. Mercola, I’ve been involved in this issue for almost 2 years now and don’t know a single man or woman who defines isolation/purification as “floating in a vacuum“.

And I make explicitly clear in my Freedom of Information requests that this is not how I define isolation/purification. Below is a screenshot from a recent FOIA request to the CDC. They have no records, like all 164 other institutions in roughly 30 countries, that have been asked by people around the world. No one on the planet has purified a sample of the alleged “virus” from a disease human, or knows of anyone who has, even though supposedly millions and millions of people are infected and spewing this “virus” every time they breath.

And no, contrary to Jeremy’s claim, it is not people such as Dr. Andrew Kaufman, or Jon Rappoport, or Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey, who bizarrely redefined the word “isolation”. It’s virologists who redefined it, to mean mixing various complicated substances together and drawing wild conclusions – quite the opposite of its historical meaning.

It’s funny how everyone knows that “isolate” means “separate” when it comes to isolating humans and the “confusion” only arises when it comes to theoretical “viruses”. And how a virologist’s use of the word “isolate” gives the impression of legitimate science when nothing could be further from the truth.

Dr. Mercola, I couldn’t help but notice the unicorn in the background over the shoulder of Jeremy’s interviewer. Was this video inserted into your blog as someone’s idea of a joke? I mean, these people proved a virus no more than a unicorn, and unicorns are a popular analogy for imaginary viruses these days, thanks to Dr. Tom Cowan, and I can’t for the life of me imagine why you would have purposely included this video when it’s completely useless to anyone looking for proof of a virus.

And no Dr. Mercola, we are not confused. We’re quite familiar with what virologists have been getting away with.

As distressing as it is to do so, since you have chosen to rehash Steve Kirsch’s summary of the curious “science” of Sabine Hazan, I will briefly address it once again, here, as I did in my educational Open Letter to Steve.

To put it bluntly, Sabine Hazan’s study is 100% useless and fraudulent. The RNA used in her “sequencing” was a genetic soup from various sources, including patients, and not shown to involve any alleged “virus”.

She fabricated meaningless codes on a computer that have never been shown to correspond to anything in the physical realm and falsely passed these off a “viral genomes”.

Sabine compared her meaningless “sequencing” results to the results of her utterly meaningless and fraudulent PCR tests (that she is quite secretive about, at least with me) that also have never been shown to have anything to do with a “virus”.

Sabine comes unhinged when directly challenged on the validity of her so-called “science”. I encourage your readers to try this themselves and see what happens (and send me the results at

Dr. Mercola, I also already addressed ATCC’s very expensive and fraudulent “virus” product that you are now promoting as well, in my educational Open Letter to Steve Kirsch. Please be sure to review that section. It includes a  Buyer Beware! from Dr. Saeed A. Qureshi, PhD, who spent 30+ years as a scientist (as opposed to a virologist) with Health Canada.

Dr. Mercola, I challenge you to track down the origin and contents of any ATCC “SARS-COV-2” product, as I did last year for the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” that is referred to as “MUC-IMB1” aka “BavPat1” and sold by companies like EVA for 2 000,00 € per vial, and report back to your readers what you learn. Report the detailed methods that were used to allegedly verify that the product contains any disease-causing “virus” whatsoever.

Regarding your claim that “Germ Theory and Terrain Theory Both Have Merit”, can you prove with science that virology has any merit whatsoever?

Please prove the existence of a specific physical thing alleged to be a disease-spreading “COVID-19 virus/variant” aka “SARS-COV-2” and prove that that specific thing spreads disease from host to host via natural modes of exposure in animals or humans.

I challenge you to publish a study proving that such a thing exists. Show with science that only subjects that are exposed to that specific thing get “COVID-19” respiratory disease, as claimed by Jeremy, whose wild unsubstantiated claims you are now disseminating.

Dr. Mercola, as evidence that “the virus” has been isolated and sequenced, you are citing studies that rely in part on PCR “tests”. Without bothering to go into all the well documented fatal flaws with these so-called tests, a little logic is in order.

  1. It is impossible to validate any “test” without a gold standard. 
  2. It is impossible to validate any “test” claimed to “confirm” the presence of a “virus” (or a “viral infection”) before the alleged “virus” has been proven to exist. 
  3. It is impossible to validate any “test” claimed to “confirm” a “viral disease” before the alleged “virus” has been a) proven to exist and b) proven to cause the disease.

Obviously an indirect test for a “virus” cannot logically be used to prove the existence of the alleged “virus”. The test is what it is. In the case of PCR, in the very best case scenario, it is evidence of the presence of the very tiny target genetic sequence. Nothing more. Not a virus, not a genome, just a tiny little sequence.

And cytopathic effects on a cell culture, any cell culture, are just that – effectsAn effect is not the cause of the effect. And wild assumptions about the cause of the effect are just that – wild assumptions, not science. This is especially true when the cells in question have been malnourished by lowering the level of food for the cells (typically fetal bovine serum) and poisoning the cells with toxic drugs.

Dr. Mercola, I am shocked that you actually published this quote from the sketchy, brief Letter from Italy that you cited, as evidence that a “virus” has been sequenced:

“[Vero E6 aka monkey kidney] Cell culture supernatants from passage 1 (P1) of four isolates were collected, and RNA was extracted…”

First of all, as you seem to understand and as should be clear by now, “isolates” do not mean purified, isolated specimens in virology. Quite the opposite. In the case of “SARS-COV-2” studies, they are monkey/cow/human mixtures. And the authors are telling you in plain language that they extracted the RNA from the cell culture supernatants. Not from a purified specimen of an alleged virus.

These authors are telling the world that they have a soup of genetic material, and are going to concoct on their computer a so-called “viral genome” out of the zillions of sequences that they (kinda, maybe, sorta) detect therein. Because this is virology, not science.

Do we really need to discuss this any further?

Dr. Mercola, fabricated “genomes”, meaningless, impossible-to-validate PCR “tests”, wild assumptions about the cause of effects on a malnourished/poisoned cell line, and arrows added to EM images and pointing at particles that were never purified, never sequenced, never characterized, never studied with controlled experiments does not add up to science.

Virology is not a science.

Dr. Mercola, it is very distressing to see you promoting blatant pseudoscience that has been used for decades to fool and coerce people around the world in myriad ways, not limited to the utterly useless and harmful injections that have fraudulently been passed off as “immunizations”.

Every time you (or someone like Peter McCullough) do this, people such as myself have to spend hours clearing up all the confusion you have caused with the public.

You need to do your due diligence, find and share the “missing” scientific proof of viruses, or retract your blog, apologize to your readers, and get on the right side of history. You’ve had 2 years already to figure this out.

Hopefully the public will soon tire of relying on “experts” and simply read the ridiculous “virus isolation” studies for themselves. When that happens, this pseudoscience (which is really too generous a word) is finished forever.

Best wishes,
Christine Massey, M.Sc.
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Pdf of my Jan. 18, 2022 email to Dr. Mercola:

Italian Nobel Candidate: It’s Not Sure This Virus Exists

Germ Theory of Diseases Spread by Viruses Has Never Been Proven

What Science Calls Viruses May Really Be Exosomes

10 thoughts on “The Alleged COVID-19 “Virus” Has Never Been Isolated

  1. Amen Ed,
    Many doctors have been saying this for 2 years. No one has isolated any C virus, aka C 1984 virus after George Orwell, an example of double speak. Plus, some of the swabs are tainted to make the gullible taker sick so they will get the poison vaccines. This is all a repeat depopulation exercise. Since the virus has been exposed by so many, anyone taking it must be insane or suicidal. Even a French Court ruled that against a life insurance claim!

  2. Two thumbs up on this article, Edward Hendrie

    Germ theory must be destroyed just like the spinning wet ball rocket. These men who lie do so in the name of their father, the Devil, and the shekels they sell it out for!

  3. Hi Ed,

    This information is being suppressed by the powers that be. I have read many of Christine Massey’s FOIA’s in her newsletters and believe she is on the right track. What she has discovered, blows this entire scam out of the water completely. It is a total game changer. Unfortunately, most people will cling to idea that we are still under threat and need the shots ad infinitum to keep them safe. If only more people read.

Leave a Comment