I have included The Expose as a resource link on this blog.
The Expose investigators present evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines that caused the most deaths came from a small number of vaccine lots distributed widely across the United States. The more benign lots of vaccines that caused few injuries or adverse events were not given the same broad distribution.
The fact that the vaccine companies distributed the more immediately deadly batches differently from the more initially benign batches means that the companies knew that those immediately deadly batches were distinctly different before distribution. That means that it was planned out in advance to distribute widely the death and hospitalizations from the COVID-19 vaccines. This proves intent!
The Expose researchers asked:
Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?
The answers to their questions are obvious; think about it logically.
• The evidence establishes that the most immediately harmful lots of COVID-19 vaccines were distributed more broadly to more states than the more benign (in the short term) lots of COVID-19 vaccines.
• That necessarily means that the companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.
• That also means that the vaccine makers identified the more immediately dangerous vaccines as such.
• In order to identify the more immediately hazardous vaccines required that the vaccine makers know that certain lots were more immediately hazardous formulations of the COVID-19 vaccines.
• They distributed those known dangerous vaccine lots differently.
• That different distribution scheme means that the vaccine makers distributed the more immediately dangerous lots differently because they had a purpose in doing so.
• The different distribution scheme for the more immediately dangerous vaccine lots suggests that the vaccine manufacturers knew that those particular vaccine lots would imminently kill and hospitalize more people per lot over a broader area of the U.S.
• This is evidence of premeditated intent to injure and kill the public by distributing a dangerous vaccine broadly across the country that the vaccine makers knew would kill and hospitalize the recipients shortly after being vaccinated. It seems that their purpose was to spread the death and injury broadly to conceal the deliberate suffering caused by the vaccines that would be camouflaged by the many uninjured vaccine recipients.
The more deadly batches were being spread broadly over the country to disperse the adverse events more evenly. A concentration of adverse events in any given area would raise concerns. But a sprinkling of adverse events among those who had none could be explained away as unusual. The benign vaccine recipients could say that they received the COVID-19 vaccine with no adverse symptoms.
They could not have a concentration of persons receiving a vaccine being hospitalized and dying all at once. So they sprinkled the poison broadly across the country.
The Expose based its investigation on official government data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Their unimpeachable findings are below.
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.
The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.
The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset .
The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.
The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.
Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.
The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.
The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.
The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.
The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.
All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.
The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.
This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).
The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.
Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.
The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.
This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.
The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.
Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.
This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.
Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.
The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.
Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.
The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA
As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.
However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.
This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.
The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.
This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.
The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.
One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.
Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes”.
But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.
Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?
Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?
Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?
Could this just be a quality control issue?
A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”.
This information about different safety profiles of different “lots” (batches of finished product of covid19 vaccines) is completely without precedent.
Dr. Yeadon said that it is unimaginable that having batches of vaccines benign and others deadly could happen by mistake. He said
Errors made in the final steps of manufacturing which resulted in certain batches bring reasonably benign & others extraordinarily deadly. I just cannot imagine the kind of mistakes which could produce such radically different clinical profiles.
Dr. Yeadon’s only rational conclusion is that there was intentional modification of the vaccines.
At some point in manufacturing, someone or some entity actively modified what was being filled into vials, and it was this which resulted in extreme skew of clinical safety profile.
Dr. Yeadon said that it is possibly intentional conduct by the vaccine makers. Indeed, how could anyone conclude otherwise given the different distribution schemes for the immediately dangerous lots of vaccines? Dr. Yeadon concluded:
There has been so much truly awful behaviour of “elites” that I’m simply not willing (as I would have historically) to dismiss the possibility that this has been done on purpose.
Dr. Yeadon called for all COVID-19 vaccinations to cease.
What I do know, and this is a test of whether there’s the slightest sign of integrity from these companies as well as the regulatory agencies, is that all use of the affected produce must immediately cease, all batches of drug substance & lots of drug product should cease.
The materials should be recalled to a place of stable storage & an intense analytical investigation initiated.
Unless factors are found which adequately explain the huge differences in clinical adverse event profiles, administration to humans must not restart.
If the manufacturers do not exhibit sufficient control of drug product, the authorisation they hold from various regulatory authorities are utterly voided.
Just when you thought this debacle couldn’t possibly get any worse, it gets much worse.
Expect to hear more about this.
Meanwhile, who in their right mind would roll up their sleeve?
What I found interesting about Dr. Yeadon’s review of The Expose report was that he only addressed the disparity in the deadliness of the vaccines. He did not address the elephant in the room. He did not mention that the drug makers distributed the immediately deadly vaccines entirely differently. That different distribution indicates that the drug makers knew which batches were deadly. Otherwise, they would not know which batches to distribute more broadly. That fact alone shows intent to harm and kill. Dr. Yeadon, Pfizer’s former vice president, ignored the evidence implicating Pfizer and Moderna in premeditated criminal conduct.
Yeadon calls for a cessation of vaccination while a safety investigation is conducted. He should be calling for a cessation of vaccination while a criminal investigation is conducted.
Karl Denninger is a technology expert, businessman, and political activist who is credited with starting the Tea Party Movement. He runs a blog called The Market Ticker.
On November 2, 2021, Karl Denninger posted an article that characterized the allegation that the vaccine makers were distributing certain bathes of COVID-19 vaccines to kill and injure people, a tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.
Denninger set out to disprove that theory and show just how ridiculous it was. But, as he used his software skills to mine the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) data, he came to a disturbing conclusion. He found that, indeed, the vaccine makers had created a certain small number of batches of vaccines that caused almost all of the deaths and adverse events. Denninger explained:
What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots being intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them — in other words certain Covid-19 vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes poisoned. That was wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads. What I found, however, was both interesting and deeply disturbing.
Denninger was flummoxed by his findings that the phenomenon of a few lots of COVID-19 vaccines were causing almost all of the deaths and hospitalizations. He was further mystified that the same activity was displayed by the makers of each of the three COVID-19 vaccines used in the U.S. Denninger found those facts very troubling. How could the same manufacturing anomaly happen across all three manufacturers unless it was part of a plan to do so?
Notice in the charts prepared by Denninger that all the three of the COVID-19 vaccine manufactures did the same thing. They all manufactured a concentration of immediately deadly lots of COVID-19 vaccines. This phenomenon cannot be by chance. Denninger points out that these are independent companies; the concentration of deadly vaccines into a few batches by all companies “cannot be explained as random chance.” It is a joint effort; the data shows a conspiracy to kill and injure.
Denninger was also troubled that the CDC, which runs the VAERS system, knows about this. He deduced that the CDC is keeping it hidden from the public by configuring VAERs in such a way to make it very difficult for the public to find the information. Notably, neither the CDC nor the FDA is doing anything about it. Denninger explains:
Something is very wrong here folks and the people running VAERS either aren’t looking on purpose, know damn well its happening and are saying nothing about it on purpose — never mind segregating the data in such a fashion that casual perusal of their downloads won’t find it — or saw it immediately and suppressed reporting on purpose.
As with Dr. Mike Yeadon, Karl Denninger does not examine the elephant in the room other than to notice it is there. Denninger states: “Oh if you’re interested the nastiest lot was literally everywhere in terms of states reporting adverse events against it; no, they didn’t concentrate them in one state or region either.” That statement is meaningless without giving it context. Denninger fails to explore the implications that the more immediately dangerous COVID-19 vaccine lots were distributed over a broad geographic area. In contrast, the more immediately benign vaccines were concentrated in particular geographic areas of distribution. That unique treatment for the more deadly vaccines suggests prior knowledge of their deadliness and an intent to spread the harm over a broad area.