Dr. Claus Kohnlein, the author of Virus Mania, reveals how the World Health Organization (WHO) has scammed the public into thinking that hydroxychloroquine is unsafe and ineffective as a therapy for COVID-19. Dr. Kohnlein explains how the WHO published a medical study during which they gave the study participants toxic dosages of hydroxychloroquine to falsely show it is unsafe and ineffective. The study can be downloaded from the link below.
The phony WHO study presents a graph showing a comparison between the mortality percentage of those alleged to have COVID-19 who took hydroxychloroquine and those alleged to have COVID-19 in the control group who did not take hydroxychloroquine. You will notice immediately that those that took the hydroxychloroquine died at a higher rate than those that received no medication. This is supposed to be scientific proof for the public and the medical community that hydroxychloroquine is unsafe and ineffective in treating COVID-19.
But hidden deep in the study is the little-publicized fact that the patients receiving the hydroxychloroquine were given toxic doses. That is correct. The doctors were poisoning the patients. Hydroxychloroquine is very safe when the dosage is kept at between 200 mg and 400 mg per day. But hydroxychloroquine has a narrow therapeutic index. That means that while hydroxychloroquine is otherwise safe, it does not take very much over the therapeutic dosage for it to be toxic.
Studies have shown that a toxic daily dosage of hydroxychloroquine is 20 mg per kg weight of the patient. Four grams 4 g of Hydroxychloroquine is considered a potentially lethal dose (4 g = 4,000 mg). The WHO study involved males and females from all over the world. The average weight of all persons in the world, male and female, is 136 pounds (62 kg). That means that the toxic dosage for hydroxychloroquine for the average person in the world is 1.24 g (62 kg x 20 mg = 1,240 mg). A common symptom of hydroxychloroquine poisoning is cardiac arrhythmia leading to death. The study of hydroxychloroquine lethality can be read in the attachment below.
What dosage of hydroxychloroquine was administered to the WHO study group? the study reported:
Hour 0, four tablets; Hour 6, four tablets; Hour 12, begin two tablets twice daily for 10 days. Each tablet contained 200mg Hydroxychloroquine sulphate.
They administered to each of the study patients a dosage of 2.4 g (2,400 mg) of hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hours of the study. That dosage of 2.4 g (2,400 mg) is 12 times the recommended dosage, which is 200 mg, and almost twice the daily toxic dosage, which is 1.24 g (1,240 mg). The doctors were poisoning the patients in the study.
The doctors followed that initial poisoning with 10 days of 800 mg, which is four (4) times the recommended daily dosage, and 60% of what would be considered a daily toxic dosage. The doctors were conducting the study across 30 countries and involving more than 405 hospitals. Weren’t they concerned that somebody might notice that they were using suspiciously high dosages of hydroxychloroquine? Of course they were. They tried to cover themselves with the following statement:
Despite concerns that the loading dose could be temporarily cardiotoxic, in neither trial was there any excess mortality during the first few days, when blood levels were highest. Neither trial recorded dosage/kg, obesity, or cardiac parameters, and cardiac deaths were too few to be reliably informative.
They knew full well that they were poisoning the study patients. They identified the first-day “loading” dosage as “temporarily cardiotoxic.” They started the study patients off with almost twice the toxic dose of Hydroxychloroquine. They admitted that that dose was “cardiotoxic.” They were poisoning their study patients and gave no explanation for why they would do such a thing. But they made sure they kept their study patients on the edge of death over the next ten (10) days by continuing to administer four (4) times the recommended daily dosage of hydroxychloroquine.
The study scientists argued that there was no “excess mortality during the first few days” and the few who died of cardiac arrest didn’t matter to the study. What they did not say was that the cumulative effect of the hydroxychloroquine over the next 10 days acted to cull the herd in the hydroxychloroquine group just enough to show that hydroxychloroquine was unsafe and ineffective.
The doctors discuss the “few” who died from cardiac arrest. They cleverly avoid discussing those who died because the toxic dosages of hydroxychloroquine compromised the immune systems of the study patients. Hydroxychloroquine is a drug that is sometimes used to modulate the immune system. That is why hydroxychloroquine is used to treat autoimmune diseases like lupus. The doctors conducting the study knew that hydroxychloroquine is immunosuppressive when it is dispensed in high dosages. Suppressing a patient’s immune systems would make the patient less able to fight off an infectious disease.
The study doctors did not want to give the recommended dosage of 200 mg per day because they knew it would not kill anyone and it would likely show hydroxychloroquine to be both safe and effective. Instead, they decided to poison their patients the first day with a “cardiotoxic” dosage of hydroxychloroquine and then keep the toxic level up for ten (10) straight days. They knew full well that they would kill some of them but “too few to be reliably informative.”
We do not know the numbers of those who died of cardiac arrest from hydroxychloroquine poisoning because the study did not report that result. All who died were listed as having died of COVID-19. Certainly, the toxic dosages of hydroxychloroquine increased the deaths by suppressing the immune systems of the patients, 65% of whom were over 50 years old and in frail health. The deaths for the Hydroxychloroquine group included those who died from the effects of hydroxychloroquine poisoning, but they were reported as COVID-19 deaths. The scientists claimed that only a few died from cardiac arrest. But they make no mention of the immunosuppressive qualities of the toxic hydroxychloroquine dosages. Are we supposed to believe mad scientists, who poison study patients, to be honest in reporting what happened in the study?
The worldwide medical establishment had to prove that hydroxychloroquine was an ineffective treatment so that they could push the emergency use of the dangerous COVID-19 vaccines on the public with the argument that [t]here is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of [Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna] COVID 19 Vaccine[s] to prevent COVID-19.
Keep in mind that he who pays the piper calls the tune. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second-largest donor in the world to the WHO. Only the U.S. Government surpasses the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in funding the WHO. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated billions for the administration of vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines, worldwide.
You must look at the donations coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as strategic investments with a big payoff in the future. Bill Gates is probably the single person on the planet who will benefit the most financially by the imposition of the COVID-19 vaccine. Gates and his foundation have close financial ties with Moderna, one of the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers. The mainstream media tries to keep a lid on that information. But it is a fact that is published on the Moderna website. The Bill & Malinda Gates Foundation is listed as one of Moderna’s strategic collaborators. Indeed, Bill gates admitted in a CNBC interview he has turned an initial $10 billion investment in vaccine manufacturing into $200 billion.
The video below containing the interview by Dr. Sam Bailey of Dr. Claus Kohnlein, the author of Virus Mania, was removed from YouTube. With the notice: “This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines.”
It is available to view on BitChute.