Scientific Proof that Vaccines Kill Infants

A 2011 study compared the infant mortality rate (IMR) of 34 countries to the number of vaccines required by their 2009 national vaccine schedule within the first year of infancy. If vaccines were safe and effective, as the pharmaceutical companies and the CDC claim, the greater the number of childhood vaccines would mean a lower infant mortality rate. But the opposite was found. The study revealed a direct correlation between the number of childhood vaccines and the mortality rate. The more vaccines administered to infants, the higher the infant death rate.

In 2009, the U.S. vaccine schedule called for 26 vaccine doses within the first year after birth, and the infant mortality rate in the U.S. was 6.22 per 1,000. The U.S. had the highest number of infant vaccines of all 34 countries in the study. The report also found that the U.S. had the highest infant mortality rate among all 34 countries. The researchers explained:

Despite the United States spending more per capita on health care than any other country, 33 nations have better IMRs. Some countries have IMRs that are less than half the US rate: Singapore, Sweden, and Japan are below 2.80. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “The relative position of the United States in comparison to countries with the lowest infant mortality rates appears to be worsening.”


The infant mortality rate is expressed as the number of infant deaths per 1000 live births. According to the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which keeps accurate, up-to-date infant mortality statistics throughout the world, in 2009 there were 33 nations with better infant mortality rates than the United States. The US infant mortality rate of 6.22 infant deaths per 1000 live births ranked 34th.

The researchers broke the countries into five categories based on the number of vaccines routinely given to the children in each country. The researchers then charted the number of vaccines in each quintile against the average mortality rate for those countries. The chart revealed a direct correlation between the number of vaccines and the average infant death rate. The more vaccines administered to infants, the higher the infant death rate.


The r-value between the number of infant vaccines and infant deaths was 0.992. The lowest r-value possible is 0.0, and the highest positive r-value is 1.0. An r value of 1.0 means a perfect one-to-one positive linear correlation between two variables. Generally, an r-value greater than 0.7 indicates a strong correlation between variables. In this case, an r-value of 0.992 indicates a very strong correlation that more infant vaccines will result in more infant deaths. The r2 for the statistics was 0.983. That means an increase in infant vaccinations explains 98.3% of infant deaths. The p-value for the statistics was 0.0009. That means that the probability of the outcome happening by chance was 0.09%. Thus, it can be said with a high degree of scientific certainty that as more vaccines are given to infants, those vaccines will cause more infant deaths. That is scientific proof that vaccines kill infants.

For more about the dangers of vaccines, read Vaccine Danger Quackery and Sin.

2 thoughts on “Scientific Proof that Vaccines Kill Infants

  1. How about too that Vaccines are given purposefully to cause all kinds of problems, from Allergies to Autism to Cancer, all in the name of depopulation and to fill the pharmaceutical companies pockets keep you always on drugs and relying on them. There is no money in healthy people.

  2. We agree that the vaccination system is a tool for population regulation. From here, the important question is: do they intend to save you? Or not?
    The vaccination system seeks to stabilize the population, at the expense of some deaths. It is an artificial selection. Today, it is difficult to appreciate. A century and a half ago, perhaps it was easier to see. In times when mortality occasionally exceeded 50%, a desperate but valid orientation was vaccination (injecting toxicity into an organism to determine its ability to adapt/survive).
    The industrial era and mass production democratized wealth. But the massive concentration of urban centers, along with absolute unhealthiness and lack of hygiene, triggered recurrent pandemics. Given the impossibility of their control, it was decided to determine the validity or adaptation of an individual beforehand based on vaccines, applied toxicity.
    The wealthy classes crave and adore determinism. The situation then did not allow it by politically correct means. Less correct methods were chosen.
    Similarly, what definitively eradicated pandemics or supposedly infectious diseases were not vaccines. They were improvements in matters related to hygiene and health.
    Vaccination began as a phenomenon within the wealthy classes. It was important to ensure the continuity of the family legacy. Given the levels of mortality, it was decided to anticipate a possible future death based on controlled toxicity in the present.

Leave a Comment