Why Are the Government and Media Conspiring to Censor the Truth of the Flat Earth?

untitled

Below is an excerpt from The Sphere of Influence. The book was published in 2019, prior to the Orwellian COVID-19 “scamdemic” and the resulting poisonous vaccines. But it is as topical today as when it was written. Concealing the truth that the earth is flat is the mother of all conspiracies.


The Sphere of Influence is a sequel to The Greatest Lie on Earth (Expanded Edition): Proof That Our World Is Not a Moving Globe. It primarily focuses on the infiltration into the church of the superstitious myth of heliocentrism and how that infiltration has served to undermine the gospel. The gospel is the entire Holy Bible, not just some of it. Matthew 4:4. Christian belief is an all-or-nothing proposition. “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” 2 Timothy 3:16.


God’s account of his creation is part and parcel of the gospel. A person with genuine faith believes what Jesus said about both heavenly and earthly things. “If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?” John 3:12.


Jesus is God. Jesus created all things in heaven and on earth. See Colossians 1:16-18. God has revealed himself through his creation.


“[T]hat which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.” Romans 1:19-20.


If men have a misunderstanding of God’s creation, they will also have a misunderstanding of who God is. If people believe in a creation that does not exist, they consequently also believe in a creator that does not exist. It is essential, therefore, to have an accurate understanding of God’s creation. God did not make a movable, spherical earth. If men believe in a heliocentric creation, they will necessarily believe in a heliocentric creator. A heliocentric creation does not exist. So also, a heliocentric creator does not exist. A heliocentric creator is a false god. We have been warned to avoid the preaching of a false gospel, which presents a false Jesus.


“For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.” 2 Corinthians 11:4.


untitled

            Taking a stand in support of the biblical model of a flat, stationary earth comes with it spiritual attack and ostracization. Often, people are cowed into submission and are persuaded to reject God’s description of his creation contained in the Bible. Indeed, pastors have been fired for preaching about God’s flat stationary earth. For example, Nate Wolfe was fired from the church he had pastored for more than seven years after it was discovered that he attended a biblical flat earth conference. 1 He had not yet even written or preached about the flat earth but was fired preemptively, apparently to prevent him from doing so.


            Many churches have made accommodation with the world system in rejecting the flat earth. The world system is scared to death about the truth of the flat earth being generally known. They will stop at nothing to keep a lid on that truth. They will characterize those who believe that the earth is flat as being crazy and even dangerous.


            Gary Shogren views those who believe in a flat earth to be conspiracy-minded lunatics. He characterizes those people as being mentally unstable. “A conspiracy mindset is one of the reasons why so many conspiracy thinkers cannot seem to hold down a job or maintain a marriage.” 2 Shogren recommends an article by Dr. Robert C. Newman under the catchy title, Evangelicals and Crackpot Science.


            Who is Dr. Robert C. Newman? He is a highly respected professor of New Testament at the Biblical Theological Seminary of Hatfield, Pennsylvania, and Director of the Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute. He holds earned degrees of Master of Divinity and Master of Sacred Theology. In the field of science, Dr. Newman received his undergraduate degree in physics from Duke University and his doctorate in theoretical astrophysics from Cornell University. He has done scientific research for the U.S. Weather Bureau and the Franklin Institute. Dr. Newman is a co-author of four books on both science and theological topics. 3


            What does the eminent Dr. Newman think of those who believe in a flat earth? Dr. Newman admonishes Christians to steer clear of, what he calls, crackpot science, like the flat earth. He views belief in a flat earth as a “danger” to be avoided at all costs because it can lead to harmful cults.

 

I will suggest that we also need to be aware of the dangers lurking in the attitudes and thinking that characterize crackpot science. These attitudes will cut us off from what God is actually doing in nature. They may easily lead us to crackpot exegesis of the Bible and to the sort of arrogance that starts cults. We certainly want to avoid all these. 4


            Drs. Robert Carter and Jonathan Safarti, who are creation scientists and influential in the Christian community, announced that those who believe in the “nonsense” of a flat, stationary earth are radicals. “Radical” is a loaded word that is ominously pregnant with meaning. Drs. Carter and Sarfati push the idea that “[c]learly, the Internet easily radicalizes people.” 5 They claim that the internet is to blame for the rise of belief in a flat and stationary earth, which they oppose. “Our only conclusion is that the Internet is breeding people who have trouble thinking through important ideas.” 6 Thus, according to Drs. Carter and Sarfati, the internet is “breeding” brain-addled “radicals” who believe that the earth is flat. That suggests something must be done about it. Drs. Carter and Sarfati subtly leave unsaid what should be done about that perceived problem, but their ominous language and tone suggest to the reader that perhaps censorship might be in order.


            The National Geographic did a documentary on those who believe in a flat earth. It seemed that the point of the documentary, which was stated repeatedly by the commentator and the orthodox scientific experts interviewed, was that belief in a flat earth is a dangerous threat to science and society. For example, during the video, the commentator (Mariana van Zeller) interviewed flat-earther, Mark Sargent, who explained that very powerful interests who rule the world from behind the scenes are responsible for the heliocentric myth. Van Zeller responded by saying: “This is for me where I think it gets really dangerous because we are going back to the dark ages. You’re essentially perpetuating ignorance by denying science. You know there is a real-life implication in all of this.” 7 Van Zeller repeated the ominous warning of danger with the following closing remark in the documentary. “Thousands of years of empirical scientific evidence is now being dismissed as a mere conspiracy, and that’s where I think it really starts getting dangerous for all of us.” 8 Van Zeller carefully chose the word “dangerous.”


            The message of danger was repeated during the National Geographic documentary. For example, during one vignette, James Bullock, Ph.D., an astrophysicist, who is a professor and Chair of Physics and Astronomy at the University of California at Irvine, was interviewed. He expressed his concern that “to question what scientists are saying and suggesting they’re part of some massive international global conspiracy it’s really scary.” 9 The interviewer (van Zeller), in a concerned tone of voice, then asked the question: “Are they a threat to the work that you do as a scientist?” 10 Dr. Bullock responded: “If say governments stop funding science because of some kind of anti-science, anti-intellectual feedback they’re getting from the populace, that’s when it really starts getting dangerous for our civilization.” 11


            Dear Reader, understand that when the media conditions people to believe that it is dangerous to our civilization to believe that the world is flat, the next step is to call for something to be done to address that danger. Such danger cannot be allowed to exist without being mitigated. A danger is a serious threat of harm, destruction, or even death. As such, the perceived danger could call for extreme measures to mitigate it.


            It seems that the mainstream media is promoting the theme that information about the flat earth is “dangerous.” They start with the premise that believing in a flat earth is insane. For example, National Post offers this opinion of those who think that world is flat: “This lunatic fringe is inflexible, tireless and cannot be persuaded by evidence or reason.” 12 Once the media establishes that it is batty to believe in a flat earth, they then apply a patina of dangerousness on that edifice of mental derangement.


            YouTube (which is owned by Google) has jumped on board the “danger” train. The mainstream media heralded the decision by YouTube to reduce recommendations of (i.e., censor) flat earth videos. YouTube considered such videos to be harmful misinformation. Google stated that it would “begin reducing recommendations of borderline content and content that could misinform users in harmful ways.” 13 A writer for the New York Intelligencer, Madison Malone Kircher, stated that “[n]ormalizing such ideas [as a flat earth] is dangerous.” 14 Kircher goes full Stalin in saying that while she is “all for quashing the spread of truly wrongheaded and potentially dangerous ideas, in the case of flat-Earth indoctrination, the damage has long since been done.” 15 Kircher complains that YouTube is, in part, to blame because it did not do anything to “curb the spread of such ideas” as the flat earth. Kircher’s view is that flat earth videos constitute “dangerous” “indoctrination” and should have been nipped in the bud by the censors at YouTube.


            Kaitlyn Tiffany in an article for The Verge titled If a Scientific Conspiracy Theory Is Funny, That Doesn’t Mean It’s a Joke. 16 That cryptic title indicating that belief in a flat earth is no joke, suggests, at the very least, that belief in a flat earth is not harmless. She began her analysis of the flat earth in the article by describing flat earth as an absurd but harmless theory. “It’s true that the theory is so absurd as to be kind of funny, and it’s fair to say that people who believe in it aren’t directly endangering anyone’s lives.” 17 Notice the qualification; she stated that the people who believe in a flat earth aren’t “directly” endangering anyone’s lives. She leaves open the question of whether there is an indirect danger to lives. She closes the door on that issue later in her article by quoting a statement by Matt Shminkowitz that belief in a flat earth is indeed indirectly dangerous. The only qualification Shminkowitz puts on its harmfulness is that the peril of believing in a flat earth is just not as immediate as “climate change denialism” or those who are against vaccinations.

 

Schimkowitz understands that flat Earth trutherism isn’t as immediately dangerous as climate change denialism or the anti-vaccine backlash, but that doesn’t mean it’s totally harmless. “I think it is important to maintain a level of concern about [conspiracy theorists],” he says. “They do things that harm society as a whole, like negate or dilute scientific reason. 18


            Alex Wong, a reporter for GQ Magazine, interviewed filmmaker Daniel Clark, who produced a documentary film about the flat earth, titled Behind the Curve. Clark stated that “[w]hen we started making the documentary, we realized we had an opportunity to use flat earthers as an extreme example of conspiracy theorists.” 19 A little known fact is that the term “conspiracy theorists” first appeared in a CIA memo (CIA Document 1035-960) that was written to address criticism of the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of President Kennedy. 20 One of the strategies advocated by the CIA in that memo was to “employ propaganda assets to negate and refute the attacks of the critics.” 21


            Wong stated that “there is a danger in believing in things that are not true.” 22 David Clark responded by affirming Wong’s belief that those who believe in a flat earth could be dangerous.

 

Yeah. There’s a danger in taking your beliefs so far that you’re willing to harm people because of them. If you can’t trust anyone, or trust anything, and everyone is your enemy, that can manifest itself in very dangerous ways, and we’ve seen that all over the world in really horrible ways. It’s great to be skeptical, but you can’t always start from nothing. 23


            Some in the media say that belief in a flat earth is harmless. But that is a ruse because in their next breath they say that people who believe such a thing also have a psychological imbalance that makes them question other matters of science such as the safety and effectiveness of vaccines and the validity of the science behind climate change. They view those perfectly rational beliefs as deadly dangerous. The belief in a flat earth is indicative of a person who has dangerous thinking toward things that are deemed to be politically incorrect.


            To question established science is to have a dangerous mind. For example, a popular YouTube channel (The Good Stuff) with more than 200,000 subscribers posted a video ominously titled How the Internet Made Us Believe in a Flat Earth (And Put the Planet in Danger?). He had this irrational apocalyptic assessment of the danger posed by those who believe the earth is flat.

 

Belief in flat earth is a harmless belief. … What does it matter to believe in a flat earth? The same flawed psychology that fuels flat earth theory fuels anti-vaxers and climate change denial. Outbreaks of preventable diseases have put some of the most vulnerable populations in our society in danger. The delay in reducing greenhouse gas emissions has committed us to around a meter rise in sea level. This will displace millions of people and erase entire cities from the map. These are beliefs that can have very real and deadly consequences. 24


            The assessment that belief that the earth is flat is deadly dangerous is what is being pushed by the mainstream media. If you believe that vaccines are unsafe and ineffective and that it is a myth that man causes global warming, then you are deadly dangerous. If you believe the earth is flat then you are also deadly dangerous because you are the very type of person who has broken from your conditioning and do not buy hook-line-and-sinker the lies that public education and the mass media are force-feeding the population.


            Belief in the flat earth is viewed by powerful interests as “dangerous. Such “dangerous” thinking cannot be allowed. The described “danger” is not actually a danger to the public. Rather, those who control governments perceive a “danger” to the mind control they have orchestrated over the masses. The flat earth is the key to breaking that conditioning. Those who control the governments of the world have a plan to address that threat to their rule. All one needs to do is look to authoritarian regimes, like the People’s Republic of China and their reeducation camps, to understand how the governments of the world intend to address the “dangerous” threat to their mind control.


            Make no mistake about it, the political liberals, like their communist brethren, are very much against free speech; to them, the free flow of unorthodox ideas is dangerous. They perceive the flat earth as a danger to their godless science and thus to society in general. They, therefore, believe that it must be stamped out. Portraying belief in a flat earth as dangerous is an ominous precursor setting the stage for more extreme measures to address that “danger.”


            Why is there such an effort to crush discussion of God’s creation of a flat earth? Neil DeGrasse Tyson, who is a famous astrophysicist, and the Director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space in New York City, let the cat out of the bag regarding the concern of the very powerful men who rule the world when he stated: “You can think the craziest thoughts you want. … Go ahead and think that but if you try to then influence others, you are actually being irresponsible, and you are destabilizing the foundations of an informed democracy.” 25


            Tyson was revealing the concern of his handlers. If people became aware that the earth is flat and enclosed within a firmament, above which is heaven, the abode of God, then the governments of the world would lose control of the people. People would then govern their own behavior to conform to God’s commands. They would understand that God is close by and watching. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32. There would be no need for an oppressive external government. Tyson is correct. If the truth of God’s creation of a flat earth became generally known, the governments of the world would lose credibility. It would destabilize the increasingly oppressive hegemony of the money powers. They cannot allow that to happen. The money powers have sprung into action against the “danger” that knowledge of God’s flat earth poses to them.


            Neil deGrasse Tyson describes the general view of God in the scientific community and among the governments of the world. “God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance.” 26 God has a response for Tyson and his ilk: “For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.” (1 Corinthians 1:18-19) The scientific community is in a conspiracy with the governments of the world to put a stop to what Neil deGrasse Tyson describes as the scientific ignorance of God. In essence, they aim to stamp out all belief in God, because they think that such belief brings only dangerous ignorance. The governments of the world will not tolerate the reversal of their great achievement of concealing the knowledge of God from men through the “science” of heliocentricity. They plan on, gradually, bit-by-bit and step-by-step, clamping down on “dangerous” free thinkers who have broken from their government conditioning to discern that the earth is stationary and flat and that God is above the firmament, ruling from his heavenly throne. H.L. Mencken explained:

 

The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos.


            Oppressive legislation and law enforcement follow from sinful behavior. As Edmond Burke explained, men are qualified for freedom in exact proportion to their moral conduct. If the people do not control their passions, then the government must step in to do it for them. Sinful men cannot be free. “Their passions forge their fetters.” And that is what the money powers want.


            If people controlled their passions in obedience to God, then there would be no justification for oppressive legislation. That is the whole purpose of false flag attacks. The Governments are in a hurry to clamp down. Often the governments who perpetrate the attacks have the oppressive legislation already written in advance of the false flag attack. The legislation is not needed to address the attack, because the attack itself was already against the law. The real reason behind the new legislation is to strip the people of their previously enjoyed freedoms. The Patriot Act is just one example. For more information about the conspiracy behind the 9/11 attacks read this author’s book, 9/11-Enemies Foreign and Domestic.


            At this moment, in the United States, the restrictions and condemnation toward belief in a flat, stationary earth is coming from the private sector. But the seemingly private mass media is so controlled by the state that it has become a virtual arm of the state. Indeed, the CIA has complete control over many news services. 27 Major media outlets parrot the CIA propaganda, which, in turn, influences public opinion and behavior. For example, the Washington Post has developed into a virtual department of the CIA. Alex Constantine reveals:

 

Former Washington Post publisher Philip Graham “believing that the function of the press was more often than not to mobilize consent for the policies of the government, was one of the architects of what became a widespread practice: the use and manipulation of journalists by the CIA.” This scandal was known by its code name Operation MOCKINGBIRD. Former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein cites a former CIA deputy director as saying, “It was widely known that Phil Graham was someone you could get help from.” 28


            Carl Bernstein, in his 1977 article for Rolling Stone, The CIA and the Media, recounts a briefing of members of the Senate Intelligence Committee by William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer, who was hired by the Senate to head the Senate investigation into CIA influence in the media. Bader told the Senate Committee members that his investigation uncovered a low-end estimate of 400 journalists who were CIA shills. Those 400+ “working journalists” included all areas of news reporting, from top management to reporters, editors, correspondents, and photographers. The CIA influence has also reached into book publishers, trade publications, and newsletters. 29


            Bernstein revealed that a senator who was the object of the Agency’s lobbying later said: “From the CIA point of view this was the highest, most sensitive covert program of all…. It was a much larger part of the operational system than has been indicated.” 30


            Why is the CIA so adamant that the lid be kept on their influence over the media? Because the media is parroting propaganda that influences the very thoughts of the population. The media is used not to inform the people, but rather as a tool of control over the masses. The CIA subversion of the media has turned the idea of a free press into a charade. Thomas Jefferson once said that “the man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.” That statement is as true today as it was in Jefferson’s day.


            The CIA subversion of the media is effective because it is generally not known. The general population of the United States believes that the major media outlets are providing them with unbiased news. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. The false belief that the news media is independent and free from government influence is why the government propaganda spewed from the major media outlets is so effective. The major media outlets are part and parcel of a mass mind control operation. That mind control is laser-focused on besmirching the reputations of all who speak the truth about the flat earth and portraying them as “dangerous.”


            The media, being secretly controlled by the CIA continually portrays belief in a flat earth as a delusional “danger” to society. All one needs to do is read history to know that once an authoritarian state views a person, group, or ideology as a “danger” to the state, persecution follows. At first, the restrictions seem minor, but as time goes by, and the state amasses more authority and power, so also the persecution becomes more onerous. The characterization of belief in a flat earth as being a mental illness is with a purpose. In a communist country, any disagreement with the communist party is viewed as a mental illness that requires a stint in a mental hospital or reeducation camp where the obstinate state adversary is tortured into submission or death.


            At present, Christian beliefs, which include God’s creation of a stationary and flat earth, are protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. But beware, the U.S. Government is gnawing at the chains of the Constitution. Each new war or conflagration (e.g., the 9/11 attacks) is used as a means to restrict God-given, constitutional rights. Step by step, inch by inch, those constitutional rights are being eroded. The shadowy money powers controlling the United States Government have slowly transformed it into a socialist government. Virtually all of the socialist programs of the U.S. Government violate the restrictions in the Constitution. Do not think that the Zionists who control the U.S. Government consider that violating the First Amendment Rights of the citizens is any big deal. The powerful cabal holding the reigns of government view the First Amendment as an impediment to its goals rather than the supreme law of the land to be obeyed.

Endnotes

1

SHOCKING – Minister FIRED from his Church for Seeking Truth, September 15, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIfhWO5XHp0.

2

Gary Shogren, Is the Earth a flat disc after all?, https://openoureyeslord.com/2016/06/21/is-the-earth-a-flat-disc-after-all/ (last visited on April 5, 2019).

3

Robert C. Newman, http://www.arn.org/authors/newman.html (last visited on April 5, 2019).

4

Robert C. Newman, Evangelicals and Crackpot Science, Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute Biblical Theological Seminary, http://www.leaderu.com/science/crackpot.html (last visited on April 4, 2019).

5

Robert Carter and Jonathan Sarfati, A Flat Earth, and Other Nonsense, Debunking Ideas That Would Not Exist Were it Not for the Internet, Creation Ministries International, 13 September 2016, updated 26 October 2018, https://creation.com/refuting-flat-earth.

6

Robert Carter and Jonathan Sarfati, A Flat Earth, and Other Nonsense, Debunking Ideas That Would Not Exist Were it Not for the Internet, Creation Ministries International, 13 September 2016, updated 26 October 2018, https://creation.com/refuting-flat-earth.

7

National Geographic, Flat Earth vs. Round Earth | Explorer, January 16, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06bvdFK3vVU.

8

National Geographic, Flat Earth vs. Round Earth | Explorer, January 16, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06bvdFK3vVU.

9

National Geographic, Flat Earth vs. Round Earth | Explorer, January 16, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06bvdFK3vVU.

10

National Geographic, Flat Earth vs. Round Earth | Explorer, January 16, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06bvdFK3vVU.

11

National Geographic, Flat Earth vs. Round Earth | Explorer, January 16, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06bvdFK3vVU.

12

Why the Flat-earth Movement Is the Best Symbol of the Increasingly Diminished Value of Truth and Intelligence, https://nationalpost.com/life/why-the-flat-earth-movement-is-the-best-symbol-of-the-increasingly-diminished-value-of-truth-and-intelligence (last visited on April 5, 2019).

13

Madison Malone Kircher, Can You Believe YouTube Caused the Rise in Flat-Earthers?, New York Intelligencer, February 19, 2019, https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/can-you-believe-youtube-caused-the-rise-in-flat-earthers.html.

14

Madison Malone Kircher, Can You Believe YouTube Caused the Rise in Flat-Earthers?, New York Intelligencer, February 19, 2019, https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/can-you-believe-youtube-caused-the-rise-in-flat-earthers.html.

15

Madison Malone Kircher, Can You Believe YouTube Caused the Rise in Flat-Earthers?, New York Intelligencer, February 19, 2019, https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/can-you-believe-youtube-caused-the-rise-in-flat-earthers.html.

16

Kaitlyn Tiffany, If a Scientific Conspiracy Theory Is Funny, That Doesn’t Mean It’s a Joke, October 9, 2017, https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/9/16424622/reddit-conspiracy-theories-memes-irony-flat-earth.

17

Kaitlyn Tiffany, If a Scientific Conspiracy Theory Is Funny, That Doesn’t Mean It’s a Joke, October 9, 2017, https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/9/16424622/reddit-conspiracy-theories-memes-irony-flat-earth.

18

Kaitlyn Tiffany, If a Scientific Conspiracy Theory Is Funny, That Doesn’t Mean It’s a Joke, October 9, 2017, https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/9/16424622/reddit-conspiracy-theories-memes-irony-flat-earth.

19

Alex Wong, What a Filmmaker Learned from Taking Flat Earthers Seriously, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, GQ Magazine, June 4, 2018, https://www.gq.com/story/behind-the-curve-flat-earth-director-interview.

20

CIA Document #1035-960, RE: Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report, http://www.jfklancer.com/CIA.html (last visited on April 16, 2019).

21

CIA Document #1035-960, RE: Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report, http://www.jfklancer.com/CIA.html (last visited on April 16, 2019).

22

Alex Wong, What a Filmmaker Learned from Taking Flat Earthers Seriously, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, GQ Magazine, June 4, 2018, https://www.gq.com/story/behind-the-curve-flat-earth-director-interview.

23

Alex Wong, What a Filmmaker Learned from Taking Flat Earthers Seriously, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, GQ Magazine, June 4, 2018, https://www.gq.com/story/behind-the-curve-flat-earth-director-interview.

24

How the Internet Made Us Believe in a Flat Earth (And Put the Planet in Danger?), December 10, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw4JMl1sErY.

25

Neil deGrasse Tyson: Flat Earth, Fake Science & Space Exploration, June 6, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuwjWZV8EA0.

26

Flat Earth – Dear Pastor, April 4, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDVt392y2LM&feature=youtu.be.

27

David Wise, supra, at 200-201.

28

Alex Constantine, The Depraved Spies and Moguls of the CIA’s Operation MOCKINGBIRD, www.whatreallyhappened.com (last visited on April 24, 2016), citing Deborah Davis, Katharine The Great, New York: Sheridan Square Press, at 119-132, 1991, and Carl Bernstein, The CIA and the Media, October 20, 1977.

29

Carl Bernstein, supra.

30

Carl Bernstein, supra.


Long-Distance Radio Transmissions Prove That the Earth is Flat

The North Star Proves the Earth Does Not Move

They Teach That the Earth Is a Spinning Globe So That People Will Doubt God Exists

PBS Caught Using CGI in an Experiment to Falsely Show the Earth is a Sphere

New Moon Occurring at Night Proves Heliocentric Model is Wrong

Company’s Space Travel Plans Using Balloons Reveals the Vacuum of Space is a Myth

Propaganda Misfire by National Geographic

Dr. Danny Faulkner Caught Speaking Lies

Documentary Video Presents Compelling Evidence That the Earth Is Flat and Stationary

3 thoughts on “Why Are the Government and Media Conspiring to Censor the Truth of the Flat Earth?

  1. Why? Mostly MONEY, that is why. NASA has been getting 20 BILLION dollars each year from the Government. Since there are no satellites or a space station, what is is for? BRIBES, kick backs, propaganda. Paid to government employees, politicians and media. The gravy train must be kept rolling until the public forces it to stop. And most Americans are blind and pagan, so it will roll on for much longer, until God stops it.

  2. I believe much of that taxpayer money is used by NASA to create weapons to be used against the people.
    There is a document called ‘Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars’ allegedly a leaked NASA document.

  3. John
    There is also a direct connection between Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislene Maxwell (whose family started the JPL [precursor to NASA] with Jack Parsons), and the head of Chinese “Rocketry” for the purpose of “Crisper Technology (the vaccines/controlling humans).”
    God is our only hope.
    “And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.” (Rev. 20:9 (KJV))

Leave a Reply to Dennis Gannon Cancel reply