“Breakthrough” Cases in the Vaccinated Population Are Actually Symptoms of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Caused by the Covid-19 Vaccines

untitled

1.         Likely, the deaths and hospitalizations suffered by those vaccinated for COVID-19 are not because the vaccines have failed to protect those who were vaccinated, but rather because the vaccines are causing the deaths and hospitalizations.


2.         Taiwan health authorities report that the number of people dying in Taiwan after their COVID-19 vaccination exceeds the number of deaths from the virus itself. The health authorities reported that as of October 11, 2021, deaths after COVID-19 vaccination reached 865. In comparison, the deaths from the virus are 845. 1 The COVID-19 vaccines used in Taiwan include Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, AstraZeneca, and a Taiwanese vaccine, Medigen.


3.         Most of the serious adverse event outcomes from the COVID-19 known to the FDA and the vaccine manufacturers are not listed in the COVID-19 fact sheets from Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna. 2 For example, deaths and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) were possible “adverse event outcomes” being monitored by the FDA during the COIVD-19 vaccine trials. They knew what to look for because they knew what they were seeing. None of the vaccine makers listed death or ADE in their fact sheets for recipients and caregivers as a risk from its COVID-19 vaccines. 3 A slide from a presentation by Steve Anderson, Director of Biostatistics and Epidemiology for the FDA, at the October 22, 2020 Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting lists ADE, which Dr. Anderson labeled “vaccine enhanced disease,” as one of the possible adverse event outcomes being monitored by the FDA during the COVID-19 vaccine trials. The FDA was keyed in and knew from the animal trails for SARS-CoV that ADE was something for which to be on the lookout. And that is why ADE was listed among the possible adverse event outcomes to monitor during the COIVDI-19 vaccine trials. There is no doubt they found ADE during the trials because we are seeing ADE from the COVID-19 vaccines being administered throughout the country.


4.         In an April 30, 2021 report filed with the FDA, Pfizer acknowledged that vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) and vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) were listed as “Important Potential Risk[s]” of the COIVD-19 vaccines. 4 Pfizer suggested that the VAED may go unreported as such because the patient suffering VAED will usually be presented as having “severe or unusual manifestations of COVID-19.” The report states:

 

Conclusion: VAED may present as severe or unusual clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Overall, there were 37 subjects with suspected COVID-19 and 101 subjects with confirmed COVID-19 following one or both doses of the vaccine; 75 of the 101 cases were severe, resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences or death. None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED/VAERD. In this review of subjects with COVID-19 following vaccination, based on the current evidence, VAED/VAERD remains a theoretical risk for the vaccine. Surveillance will continue. 5


5.         That means that the often announced “breakthrough” cases of COVID-19 are likely not COVID-19 cases but are rather cases of vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED), otherwise known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), caused by the COVID-19 vaccines themselves. Indeed, the data coming in from all over the world suggests that the “breakthrough” cases of alleged COVID-19 among the vaccinated population are actually cases of ADE caused by the COVID-19 vaccines. 6


6.         Renowned virologist and Nobel Prize Laureate Prof. Luc Montagnier explained that the so-called breakthrough COVID-19 infections being suffered by the fully vaccinated persons are infections caused by the COVID-19 vaccines. 7 Dr. Montagnier said that the high rate of COVID-19 infections among the fully vaccinated population is due to “antibody-dependent enhancement” (ADE).


7.         The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) offers a concise explanation of ADE:

 

Many vaccines work by inducing neutralizing antibodies. However, not all antibody responses are created equal. Sometimes antibodies do not prevent cell entry and, on rare occasions, they may actually increase the ability of a virus to enter cells and cause a worsening of disease through a mechanism called antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). 8


8.         One would think that all antibodies are good, and thus, you would want to enhance the antibodies. But that is not the case because there are two kinds of antibodies. There are neutralizing antibodies and binding antibodies. Neutralizing antibodies, as the name suggests, neutralize the virus. Binding antibodies do not neutralize the virus; they bind to it and enhance the virus’s ability to infect cells. This increases disease. The COVID-19 vaccines cause the production of higher levels of binding antibodies. That causes the disease to spread. This effect was seen when the ADE killed coronavirus (SARS-CoV) vaccine test animals who received the vaccines. 9 Dr. Joseph Mercola gives more details of the SARS-Cov ferret experiments:

 

In my May 2020 interview above with Robert Kennedy Jr., he summarized the history of coronavirus vaccine development, which began in 2002, following three consecutive SARS outbreaks. By 2012, Chinese, American and European scientists were working on SARS vaccine development, and had about 30 promising candidates.

 

Of those, the four best vaccine candidates were then given to ferrets, which are the closest analogue to human lung infections. In the video below, which is a select outtake from my full interview, Kennedy explains what happened next. While the ferrets displayed robust antibody response, which is the metric used for vaccine licensing, once they were challenged with the wild virus, they all became severely ill and died.

 

The same thing happened when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine in the 1960s. RSV is an upper respiratory illness that is very similar to that caused by coronaviruses. At that time, they had decided to skip animal trials and go directly to human trials.

 

“They tested it on I think about 35 children, and the same thing happened,” Kennedy said. “The children developed a champion antibody response — robust, durable. It looked perfect [but when] the children were exposed to the wild virus, they all became sick. Two of them died. They abandoned the vaccine. It was a big embarrassment to FDA and NIH.” 10


9.         Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., M.S., the inventor of the mRNA technology used by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna in their COVID-19 vaccines, states that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing ADE. Dr. Malone indicates that the scientific evidence is becoming increasingly clear that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing the virus to replicate at higher levels than would be the case in the absence of the vaccination. 11 He said that this phenomenon of ADE was predictable because ADE has happened in every coronavirus study ever conducted. He said the data indicates that as the immune response from the COVID-19 vaccines wanes after six months, the ADE is kicking in, and we see the result with increased hospitalizations. The hospitalizations are not from breakthrough infections in those vaccinated but rather from ADE brought on by the vaccine itself. The ADE causes the virus to replicate more efficiently than it would otherwise. Dr. Malone further states that those in the vaccinated population are generating the delta variant of COVID-19 due to the COVID-19 vaccine.


10.       One research study explained:

 

There are also immunopathological complications associated with the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines that require addressing and further optimization. One adverse effect is the induction of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) effect, which is usually caused by vaccine-induced suboptimal antibodies that facilitates viral entry into host cells. 12


11.       Since the investigational vaccines for SARS-CoV caused ADE, it is thus not a surprise to find that the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines also cause ADE.


12.       Researcher Ken Garber explains:

 

There are mounting theoretical concerns that vaccines generating antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 may bind to the virus without neutralizing it. Should this happen, the non-neutralizing antibodies could enhance viral entry into cells and viral replication and end up worsening infection instead of offering protection, through the poorly understood phenomenon of ADE. ADE “is a genuine concern,” says virologist Kevin Gilligan, a senior consultant with Biologics Consulting, who advises thorough safety studies. “Because if the gun is jumped, and a vaccine is widely distributed that is disease enhancing, that would be worse than actually not doing any vaccination at all.” 13


13.       A study was conducted by Timothy Cardozo of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Langone Health, New York, and Ronald Veazey of the Division of Comparative Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, Tulane National Primate Research Center. The scientists determined in their research that the COVID-19 vaccines caused an increase in the risk of more severe diseases caused through ADE. They concluded that recipients of COVID-19 vaccines should be warned about all the dangers of ADE before being vaccinated. The scientists determined that the COVID-19 vaccines worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). They were concerned that the dangers are kept secret in clinical trial protocols and consent forms. 14 The researcher stated:

 

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

 

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent. 15


14.       Many other researchers have determined that the COVD-19 vaccines pose a clear danger of ADE. In another study, the researchers concluded:

 

Antibody-based drugs and vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being expedited through preclinical and clinical development. Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). 16


15.       Another researcher pleaded for caution in the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine:

 

[B]ecause ADE of disease cannot be reliably predicted after either vaccination or treatment with antibodies-regardless of what virus is the causative agent-it will be essential to depend on careful analysis of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move forward. 17


16.       As we have learned, there are two kinds of antibodies. “There are neutralizing antibodies and binding antibodies (aka, non-neutralizing antibodies). We want neutralizing antibodies but not the binding antibodies. Binding antibodies do not ‘neutralize’ the virus when they bind, and rather, their presence indicates a potential problem.” 18 The current vaccines have been touted as successful, but their “success” is based on antibody production. It is not based on challenging the test participants with the virus to see if there is successful protection from the virus or whether they would be an antibody-dependent enhancement that would make the test participant ill. 19 Why was that not done? Presumably, it is because the researchers knew from the SARS-CoV animal studies that the test subjects would suffer ADE. A vaccine producing ADE could never be approved.


17.       The ADE is manifesting among the vaccinated. For example, it was reported on August 26, 2021, that the hospitals in Israel were filling up with vaccinated patients. Dr. Steven Li reported for the Vision Times:

 

On Aug. 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, medical director of Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, said in a Channel 13 TV News interview, “95% of the severe patients are vaccinated.” Furthermore, “85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people” and the hospital is “opening more and more COVID wards.” 20


18.       ADE was predictable. Pfizer-BiNTech was aware of the risk of ADE. They knew all about it from the SARS-CoV animal trials. Pfizer-BiNTech, in their briefing document sent to the FDA in their request for an EUA, claimed that the available data did not show any vacccine-enhanced disease during the short follow up period of their study. But in the next sentence, the company warned that the risk of ADE remains unknown and needs to be evaluated in ongoing trials.

 

However, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure. 21


19.       Notice that Pfizer-BiNTech states that there was a risk of ADE “potentially associated with waning immunity.” 22 That is precisely what the animal studies showed. And that is why Pfizer-BiNTech said that. Pfizer-BioNTech knew that there was a risk of ADE “with waning immunity.” The statement that the risk was unknown is misleading. They knew there was a general risk and that the risk was real; they just did not know it with precision. That is what Dr. Malone explained. He said that this phenomenon of ADE was predictable because ADE has happened in every coronavirus study ever conducted. 23 Pfizer-BiNTech and Moderna certainly knew that. Dr. Malone also revealed that the studies showed that the ADE could be expected to show up as the immune response from the COVID-19 vaccines wanes. He put the time frame at six months for the immune response wanting at six months. Moderna and Pfizer-BiNTech knew that also. Indeed, they said that the risk of ADE was “potentially associated with waning immunity.” 24 The ADE from the COVID-19 vaccines we are witnessing is not a surprise to the CDC, the FDA, Moderna, or Pfizer-BioNTech. It was predictable. Both Pfizer and Moderna state that the risk of ADE “needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure.” 25 But no such trials are being conducted. All we hear from both companies and the CDC is that the hospitalizations and deaths of the vaccinated population are from breakthrough infections. They now deny that ADE is a reality.


20.       Identical language about the risk of ADE can be found in the Moderna briefing document. ADE is a known risk for the mRNA coronavirus vaccines. That is why both Pfizer and Modern mentioned it. ADE perfectly explains the VAERS reporting of 595,620 adverse events, including 13,068 deaths, 17,228 permanent disabilities, and 54,142 hospitalizations as of August 13, 2021. 26 The VAERS system reports correlation; it does not mean that causation has been proven. Recall that the HHS-funded study reported that the VAERS database is only catching 1% of all of the vaccine-related adverse events. 27 The means that each of the above numbers can be multiplied by 100 to get the true scope of the damage being done by the COVID-19 vaccines. For example, the 13,068 VAERS deaths represents 1,306,800 actual deaths. The VAERS system reports correlation; it does not mean that causation has been proven. Recall that Megan Redshaw determined that 41% of those getting a COVID-19 vaccine died after becoming ill within 48 hours of injection. 28 We will consider that as establishing a reasonable belief that the COVID-19 vaccines were the cause of the deaths. Thus, we come up with a conservative figure of 535,763 persons we have probable cause to believe died from the COVID-19 vaccines as of August 13, 2021.


21.       Please understand that some pharmaceutical companies are notorious for committing criminal fraud. One of them happens to be the manufacturer of a COVID-19 vaccine. On September 2, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Pfizer “agreed to plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for misbranding Bextra with the intent to defraud or mislead.” 29 As part of that settlement, Pfizer “agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice.” 30 Pfizer is a repeat offender. 31 Between 1991 and 2017, Pfizer entered into 34 civil and criminal settlements with the federal and state governments totaling $4.7 billion. 32 Past behavior is the best predictor of future conduct. The VAERS data indicates that Pfizer-BiNTech is responsible for 69% of the COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported in VAERS. 33 Extrapolating from the VAERS data, as explained above, I have probable cause to believe that out of the 601,100 persons who have died from the COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, are responsible for killing 415,100 of those people. 34 Those figures are as of August 13, 2021; the carnage continues.

Endnotes

1

Tiffany Meier, More Die After Vaccination Than From COVID-19 in Taiwan, China In Focus, NTD News, October 13, 2021, https://www.ntd.com/more-die-after-vaccination-than-from-covid-19-in-taiwan_688004.html.

2

COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Fact Sheets for Recipients and Caregivers, August 6, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/eua/index.html.

3

Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of The Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to Prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Individuals 18 Years of Age and Older, August 27, 2021, https://www.janssenlabels.com/emergency-use-authorization/Janssen+COVID-19+Vaccine-Recipient-fact-sheet.pdf.

4

Pfizer admits in Confidential Documents that its Covid-19 Vaccine may cause Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease; and real-world data now proves it definitely does, The Expose, February 3, 2022, https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/03/pfizer-admits-covid-vaccine-causes-ade/.

5

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT

REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021, https://drtrozzi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Pfizer-Cumulative-Analysis-of-Post-authorization-Adverse-Event-Reports.pdf.

6

A Comparison of Official Government Reports Suggests the Fully Vaccinated Are Suffering Antibody Dependent Enhancement, The Expose, January 23, 2022, https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/23/world-government-data-shows-covid-vaccinated-suffering-ade/.

7

Nobel Prize Winner French Virologist Luc Montagnier Explains How COVID-19 Vaccines Are Creating Variants, March 21, 2021, https://greatgameindia.com/covid-19-vaccines-creating-variants/.

8

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Vaccines, Children’s Hospital of Philidelphia, https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/antibody-dependent-enhancement-and-vaccines (last visited on August 26, 2021).

9

New Strain? Or Antibody Dependent Enhancement?, Everly Report, December 21, 2020, https://everlyreport.com/new-strain-or-antibody-dependent-enhancement/.

10

Joseph Mercla, How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System, Signs of the Times, 11 November 2020, https://www.sott.net/article/445095-How-COVID-19-vaccine-can-destroy-your-immune-system.

11

Larry Johnson, Inventor of mRNA Vaccine: Some Covid Vaccines Make the Virus More Dangerous, Gateway Pundit, July 28, 2021, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/inventor-mrna-vaccine-covid-vaccines-make-virus-dangerous/.

12

Yen-Der Li, et. al., Coronavirus Vaccine Development: from SARS and MERS to COVID-19, NIH, 20 December 2020, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749790/.

13

Ken Garber, Coronavirus Vaccine Developers Wary of Errant Antibodies, 5 June 2020, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41587-020-00016-w, found at https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/covid19/130189-we-need-plan-b-no-vaccine-33.html.

14

Nobel Prize Winner French Virologist Luc Montagnier Explains How COVID-19 Vaccines Are Creating Variants, March 21, 2021, https://greatgameindia.com/covid-19-vaccines-creating-variants/.

15

Timothy Cardozo, et al., Informed Consent Disclosure to Vaccine Trial Subjects of Risk of COVID-19 Vaccines Worsening Clinical Disease, NIH, Int J Clin Pract., March 2021, vol. 75, Issue 3, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/.

16

Wen Shi Lee, et. al., Antibody-dependent Enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Therapies, NIH, September 9, 2020, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32908214/.

17

Ann M. Arvin, A Perspective on Potential Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of SARS-CoV-2, 2020 July 13, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32659783/.

18

New Strain? Or Antibody Dependent Enhancement?, Everly Report, December 21, 2020, https://everlyreport.com/new-strain-or-antibody-dependent-enhancement/.

19

New Strain? Or Antibody Dependent Enhancement?, Everly Report, December 21, 2020, https://everlyreport.com/new-strain-or-antibody-dependent-enhancement/.

20

Steven Li, Hospital Fully Vaccinated, Doctor Calls Mandates ‘Diabolic’, Vision Times, August 8, 2021, https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/08/08/israel-hospital-vaccinated.html.

21

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, December 10, 2020, FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, at 49, https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

22

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, December 10, 2020, FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, at 49, https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

23

Larry Johnson, Inventor of mRNA Vaccine: Some Covid Vaccines Make the Virus More Dangerous, Gateway Pundit, July 28, 2021, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/inventor-mrna-vaccine-covid-vaccines-make-virus-dangerous/.

24

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, December 10, 2020, FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, at 49, https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

25

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, December 10, 2020, FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, at 49, https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

26

VAERS COVID Vaccine Data, August 13, 2021, https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data.

27

Lazarus, Ross, et al., Grant ID: R18 HS 017045, Final Report, Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS), at 6, 2/01/07 – 09/30/10, Submitted to: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf.

28

Megan Redshaw, Latest VAERS Data Show Reports of Blood Clotting Disorders After All Three Emergency Use Authorization Vaccines, The Defender, April 16, 2021, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-reports-clotting-disorders-all-three-emergency-use-authorization-vaccines/?itm_term=home. See also Tyler Durden, What The CDC’s VAERS Database Reveals About “Adverse” Post-Vaccine Reactions, April 18, 2021, https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/what-cdcs-vaers-database-reveals-about-adverse-post-vaccine-reactions.

29

Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History, Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing, September 2, 2009, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history.

30

Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History, Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing, September 2, 2009, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history.

31

Sammy Almashat, et. al., Twenty-Seven Years of Pharmaceutical Industry Criminal and Civil Penalties: 1991 Through 2017, Public Citizen, March 14, 2018, https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/2408.pdf.

32

Sammy Almashat, et. al., Twenty-Seven Years of Pharmaceutical Industry Criminal and Civil Penalties: 1991 Through 2017, Public Citizen, March 14, 2018, https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/2408.pdf.

33

VAERS COVID Vaccine Data, August 13, 2021, COVID Vaccine Reported Mortality Breakdowns, https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality.

34

VAERS COVID Vaccine Data, August 13, 2021, COVID Vaccine Reported Mortality Breakdowns, https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality.


The following article was posted on January 23, 2022 on The Expose:

Official Government and Public Health data available from around the world strongly suggests that the triple/double Covid-19 vaccinated population are suffering from antibody dependent enhancement.

In some cases, antibodies can enhance virus entry and replication in cells. This phenomenon is called antibody-dependent infection enhancement (ADE). ADE not only promotes the virus to be recognized by the target cell and enters the target cell, but also affects the signal transmission in the target cell.

In other words, ADE occurs when the antibodies generated during an immune response recognise and bind to a pathogen, but they are unable to prevent infection. Instead, these antibodies act as a “Trojan horse,” allowing the pathogen to get into cells and exacerbate the immune response.

The result is often more severe illness than if the person had been unvaccinated, and this is precisely what we are now seeing around the world.

All of the above is not indicative of a safe and effective vaccine. It is indicative of a failed vaccine that is causing severe injury and death, alongside weakening the immune systems of recipients leading to either Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or antibody dependent enhancement.

The following research elaborates on the above in much more detail –

England

The week 1 – 2022- Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 49 and week 52 of 2021 (December 6th to January 2nd), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period proved to be as follows –

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-69-1024x345.png

The real-world vaccine effectiveness is calculated by using the same formula used by Pfizer to claim that their vaccine had an effectiveness of 95%. In the clinical trial; which is still ongoing, the number of confirmed cases among the vaccinated was subtracted from the number of confirmed cases among the not vaccinated group. This number was then divided by the number of cases among the unvaccinated and then multiplied by 100 to calculate the vaccine effectiveness.

(Unvax Cases – Vax Cases / Unvax cases x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness)

Pfizer were able to do this because there was an equal amount of people in both the unvaccinated and vaccinated group. Now, because UKHSA supply the case-rates per 100,000 people in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated population, we are able to use the same formula to calculate the real-world effectiveness, and here’s how the effectiveness has evolved over 5 months in England from 16th Aug 21 to 2nd Jan 22 –

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-79-1024x784.png

The first booster shots were administered in week 37 of 2021, and this graph illustrates clearly how they provided a boost in vaccine effectiveness in the following two months. But unfortunately it also shows how short lived this boost was with the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between week 49 and 52.

Real-world vaccine effectiveness dropped to the lowest levels yet across all age groups except for the over 70’s between December 6th and January 2nd, but the over 70’s still dropped into negative effectiveness.

Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack and provoking the immune system into responding as if you have had the virus. They are supposed to train the immune system to the point where you develop natural immunity to the virus. Therefore, vaccine effectiveness is really a measure of the immune system performance induced by the vaccine.

  • A vaccine effectiveness of +50% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is 50% better at tackling Covid-19.
  • A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 0% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, meaning the vaccines are ineffective. In other words the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is equal to that of the unvaccinated at tackling Covid-19.
  • Whilst a vaccine effectiveness of -50% would mean that the unvaccinated were 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the fully vaccinated, meaning the vaccines actually decimate the immune system.

Therefore with the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines proving to be negative in everyone over the age of 18 in England, this means double/triple vaccinated adults immune system performance is being decimated.

But in order to calculate the immune system performance we need to perform a slightly different calculation to the one used to calculate vaccine effectiveness.

Instead of dividing by the unvaccinated cases, we need to divide by the largest of either the unvaccinated or vaccinated cases.

The calculation for a positive immune system performance is –

Unvax Cases – Vax Cases / Unvax cases x 100 (The same calculation used for vaccine effectiveness)

Whilst the calculation for a negative immune system performance is –

U – Vax Cases / Vax cases x 100

The following graph illustrates the overall immune system performance among all age groups in England over the past 5 months –

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-78-1024x800.png

What we can see from the above is that the immune system performance for adults aged between 18 and 59 has deteriorated to the worst levels yet since they were given the Covid-19 vaccine. Whilst the immune system performance of everyone over the age of 60 has deteriorated dramatically following receipt of the booster shot, but not yet to the level seen between week 37 and week 40.

The over 70’s have however seen the most dramatic fall in immune system performance between month 4 and month 5 alongside 18-29-year-olds.

If the immune system performance was to hit -100%, this would essentially mean that these people would be suffering from some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. They would in effect have no immune system capability whatsoever.

But here’s what that the reduced immune system performance so far has meant in terms of Covid-19 hospitalisations in England over December and January.

Page 35 of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 3 – 2022 contains the statistics on Covid-19 hospitalisations between week 51 of 2021 and week 2 of 2022, and they confirm that the NHS has very much been overwhelmed by the vaccinated population.

According to table 10, between 20th Dec 21 and 16th Jan 22, there were a total of 14,776 people admitted to hospital with Covid-19, and 10,051 of them had received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-218-1024x787.png

But when we remove the under 18’s from the equation, many who are not eligible for vaccination, we find that the figures for the vaccinated are even worse. The not-vaccinated population accounted for 3,418 hospitalisations, the one-dose vaccinated population accounted for 670 hospitalisations, the two-dose vaccination population accounted for 4,116 hospitalisations, whilst the three-dose vaccinated accounted for 5,139 Covid-19 hospitalisations.

Overall the not-vaccinated population accounted for 32% of all Covid-19 hospitalisations between week 51 and week 2 2022, whilst the vaccinated population accounted for 68%. But when removing under 18’s from the equation we find that the unvaccinated population accounted for 26% of all hospitalisations, and the vaccinated accounted for a worrying 74%.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-215-1024x788.png

Scotland

Public Health Scotland (PHS) publish a weekly Covid-19 Statistical Report containing data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths over a period of four weeks, and they confirm what we’ve been trying to inform the public of for months – the Covid-19 vaccines do not work and make the recipients worse.

Table 14 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical Report published 12th Jan 22, shows the age-standardised case rates per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status. Just like we did with the data found in the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance report, we’re able to use these figures to calculate the real-world vaccine effectiveness.

Source Data

What we can see here is that vaccine effectiveness has been declining by the week, falling from -71% in the week beginning 11th Dec 21, to -133% in the week beginning 25th Dec 21.

This equates to an average immune system performance decline among all age-groups of around 7.5% per week, and as we can see as of the week ending 31st Dec 21 the age-standardised immune system performance of the fully vaccinated was 57% worse than their not-vaccinated counterparts, and again this is reflected in terms of Covid-19 hospitalisations and deaths.

For months authorities have used the rates per 100,000 population to justify that the Covid-19 vaccines are effective, but we can guarantee they will now no longer use this metric because the rates per 100,000 population have been highest among the double vaccinated population since at least the middle of December 2021.

Table 15 of the latest PHS report shows the number of confirmed Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status between 18th December 2021 and 14th January 2022, and the table shows that the most hospitalisations have been recorded among the double vaccinated population.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-180.png

The same table also shows that the age-standardised Covid-19 hospitalisation rate per 100,000 double vaccinated individuals is higher than the hospitalisation rate among the not-vaccinated population.

Since the 1st January the hospitalisation rate has been highest among the double vaccinated, and the average rate per 100,000 between 18 Dec 21 and 14 Jan 22 equates to 41.16 per 100k unvaccinated individuals, but 43.3 per 100k double vaccinated individuals. Meaning the double vaccinated population are statistically more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19 than the not-vaccinated population.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-174-1024x794.png

Table 16 of the latest PHS report shows the number of confirmed Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status between 11th December 2021 and 7th January 2022, and the table shows that deaths among the double vaccinated population outnumber deaths among the not-vaccinated population by approximately 2.5 to 1.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-182.png

The same table also shows that the age-standardised Covid-19 death rate per 100,000 double vaccinated individuals is higher than the death rate among the not-vaccinated population.

Since at least the 11th Dec 21, the death rate has been highest among the double vaccinated, with the week beginning 18th Dec seeing a tremendous difference. During this week the double vaccinated population were statistically 4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the not vaccinated population.

The average age standardised Covid-19 death rate was 5.36 per 100,000 individuals among the not-vaccinated population between 11th Dec 21 and 7th Jan 22. But the average death rate among the two dose vaccinated population was 8.3 per 100,000 during the same time frame.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-177-1024x795.png

Therefore, the latest data from Public Health Scotland confirms in black and white that the Covid-19 vaccines not only do not work, they make the recipient worse because they are much more likely to catch Covid-19, be hospitalised with Covid-19, and die of Covid-19 than the not-vaccinated population.

Australia

Australia is currently suffering the largest rise in Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths across the country since the pandemic struck in March 2020, despite adopting strict Draconian policies that only allow the vaccinated to participate in society because authorities are wrongly labelling the unvaccinated a danger to public health.

According to official data, New South Wales (NSW) Australia has seen Covid-19 deaths increase ten-fold since the middle of December 2021, breaking records for the number of confirmed deaths in the region since Covid-19 first struck in March 2020.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-165.png

But it isn’t the unvaccinated population who are accounting for the record breaking number of Covid-19 deaths, it’s the fully vaccinated.

According to the NSW Government’s weekly Covid-19 Weekly Surveillance Report, the most recent of which was published on 13th Jan 22, between 26th Nov 21 and 1st Jan 22 there were 1,578 Covid-19 hospitalisations in NSW, Australia.

Of these the triple/double vaccinated accounted for 1,280, the partly vaccinated accounted for 47, and the not-vaccinated population accounted for just 251. This means the vaccinated population accounted for 84% of Covid-19 hospitalisations since Omicron struck.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-160-1024x764.png

Page 8 of the same report (found here), reveals the number of Covid-19 deaths between 26th Nov 21 and 1st Jan 22 by vaccination status, and in all there were a total of just 32 deaths. However, we know from other available data that the state fo NSW, Australia is now recording more deaths in a single day as of 17th Jan 22 than it did between 26th Nov and 1st Jan.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-162-1024x764.png

Yet again, according to the NSW Government report, the fully vaccinated accounted for the majority of deaths recording a total of 22, with a further 3 deaths being recorded among the partly vaccinated population, and just 7 deaths being recorded among the not-vaccinated population.

This means that between 26th Nov 21 and 1st Jan 22, the vaccinated population accounted for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 deaths.

Vaccination was billed as the solution to “a pandemic that never was”, in Australia. But it looks like a pandemic that never really got going in Australia, is just beginning, and it’s most certainly a pandemic of the fully vaccinated.

FIFA Professional Football/Soccer Player Deaths

As if acquired immunodeficiency syndrome/antibody dependent enhancement wasn’t a bad enough side effect of the Covid-19 injections, extensive research has also revealed that the effect these jabs have on the human cardiovascular system is nothing short of horrendous.

Deaths of professional football/soccer players due to cardiovascular issues are doubling every three months, with the number of deaths occurring in December 2021 equalling the annual average over the previous 12 years.

In all, deaths among professional football/soccer players in 2021 were 4 times the average rate recorded between 2009 and 2020.

The following graph shows the total number of listed Fifa football match deaths and male cardiovascular football match deaths to have occurred every year since 2009.

The data within the graph was obtained from the following –

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-244-1024x757.png

The data shows that professional football/soccer players died of cardiovascular problems during games (match or training) at 4 times the average rate recorded between 2009 and 2020.

It also reveals that there were more than 15x as many deaths due to cardiovascular issues in 2021 than there were in 2020.

But what’s most concerning is that there were 3.5 times as many deaths in December 2021 than there were in the whole of 2020, and there were almost as many deaths in December 2021 (7) as the annual average rate over the last 12 years (7.8 per year).

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-239.png

Cardiovascular deaths among professional football/soccer players are doubling every quarter. So by the end of 2022 they may have risen to 320 per quarter (40, 80, 160, 320). The advice given to footballers who collapse but survive is that they should cease all strenuous activity for 3 months. These figures reveal that all athletes who are Covid-19 vaccinated should do the same thing.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-242-1024x776.png

But these figures should not come as a surprise, and we only need to take closer look at data found in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the USA to see why.

VAERS data shows that heart damage is ubiquitous throughout the vaccinated population, and the damage is being diagnosed in multiple ways. Acute cardiac failure rates are now 475 times the normal baseline rate in VAERS. Tachycardia rates are 7,973 times the baseline rate. Acute myocardial infarction is 412 times the baseline rate. The rates of internal haemorrhage, peripheral artery thrombosis, coronary artery occlusion are all over 300 times the baseline rate.

Fully vaccinated people are suffering like never before, and unfortunately it seems to be the younger you are, the worse it gets.

The American Heart Association published a study which found that 98% of all cases of Myocarditis among children are due to the mRNA Covid-19 injections.

Myocarditis is a condition that causes inflammation of the heart muscle and reduces the heart’s ability to pump blood, and can cause rapid or abnormal heart rhythms.

Eventually myocarditis weakens the heart so that the rest of the body doesn’t get enough blood. Clots can then form in the heart, leading to a stroke of heart attack. Other complications of the condition include sudden cardiac death. There is no mild version of myocarditis, it is extremely serious due to the fact that the heart muscle is incapable of regenerating. Therefore, one the damage is done there is no rewinding the clock.

The new study was conducted by dozens of doctors and scientists from several Universities, Children’s Hospitals, and Schools of Medicine across the USA and was published on the American Heart Association’s (AHA) journal ‘Circulation’ on December 6th 2021.

Results shows that suspected myocarditis occurred in 136 of the patients equating to 98% of all cases of myocarditis. The Pfizer injection was responsible for 131 (94%) of these cases, with 128 (92% occurring after the second dose.

Source

Conclusion

We can clearly see from world-wide data that the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections wains significantly in a short amount of time, but unfortunately for the vaccinated population, rather than the immune system returning to the same state it was prior to vaccination, the immune system performance begins to rapidly decline making it inferior to that of the unvaccinated.

This is materialising into –

  • record-breaking cases, hospitalisations, and deaths in Australia; with the vast majority occurring among the fully vaccinated,
  • age-standardised hospitalisation rates and mortality rates being highest among the fully vaccinated in Scotland, and
  • 7 in every 10 Covid-19 hospitalisations, and 8 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths in England occurring among the triple/double vaccinated.

Booster shots of the injections are not the answer to this problem though, the evidence shows that whilst they supply a minor boost to the immune system, it is very short lived and then begins to decline at an even sharper pace than prior to the booster.

So what can be done?

Who knows, there is no long-term data out there to provide a solution to this issue, because these are experimental injections, and we fear the damage is now done.

All we do know is that offical Government and Public Health data available from around the world strongly suggests that the triple/double Covid-19 vaccinated population are suffering from antibody dependent enhancement.


Federal Workers’ Assertion of Rights and Report of Government Wrongdoing

14 thoughts on ““Breakthrough” Cases in the Vaccinated Population Are Actually Symptoms of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Caused by the Covid-19 Vaccines

  1. Sars Cov-19 does not exist. It has never been isolated, verified, or purified. The only way to catch a virus is by injection. People get sick due to cell toxicity. You are what you eat, and the body must purge out toxins when the bodies cells becomes toxin, hence the body calls upon it’s own viruses to cleanse out the garbage. They have the whole world believing in a lie and conforming to what Isn’t!

Leave a Reply to IL Cancel reply