It is Sodomite Pride Month: They Want Your Children

The following is based largely on a chapter from The Sphere of Influence: The Heliocentric Perversion of the Gospel.

The sodomite privileged class springs from a godless generation, with no fear of God. Indeed, they must necessarily reject the God of the Bible, because within the Bible is found God’s condemnation of sodomy. “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22) That sin is so abhorrent to God that he rained fire and brimstone upon Sodom and Gomorrah as punishment for that filthy sin. “Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.” Genesis 19:24. Nowadays, however, sodomy is viewed as a protected lifestyle, with the U.S. Supreme Court judging sodomy a good thing, even to the degree of creating a right for same-sex couples to get married. God curses those who call the sin of sodomy good. “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20)

I explain in detail in The Greatest Lie on Earth how sin begets sin. Once a sin is legitimized and protected by the force of government, it begins a downward trajectory, where more sin is legitimized and protected. We see that with the civil rights legislation giving special privileges and protections to sodomites, which in turn crushes Christian liberties. For example, New Mexico’s Supreme Court unanimously ruled that two Christian photographers, Elaine and Jonathan Huguenin, who declined to photograph a same-sex union violated the state’s Human Rights Act. The Attorney General of the State of Washington filed a lawsuit against a florist who refused to provide flowers for a same-sex couple’s wedding.  The Attorney General of the State of Washington filed a lawsuit against a florist who refused to provide flowers for a same-sex couple’s wedding. The florist lost in court, and the court decision was upheld by the Supreme Court of Washington.

Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado was ordered by a judge either to serve sodomite couples or face fines. Phillips appealed his persecution and won in the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision by the U.S. Supreme Court was not a complete victory. The Court did not rule that the Colorado law itself that protected sodomites was an infringement on the baker’s constitutional rights to free speech and religion, it was only the unfair way in which the Colorado Civil Rights Commission enforced the law that was unconstitutional. Thus, he was subjected to continued harassment by the state of Colorado. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission was at it again with another prosecution against Phillips for his refusal to make a cake for a transgender customer. The commission alleged that Phillips discriminated against a customer based upon gender identity in violation of Colorado law.

“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.” (Proverbs 29:2)

The government-protected privileges granted to sodomites is only the first step toward the degenerative goal of the evil occultists who control the governments of the world, which is to legalize sex with children. The powerful elite of the world today secretly engage in all manner of pederasty, which this author details in his book, Antichrist: The Beast Revealed. Indeed, the elite have plans to normalize pedophilia.

The allegation that there is a move afoot to normalize pedophilia is not hyperbole. In a 60 Minutes Australia documentary about pedophiles, they focused on a progressive theory by Dr. James Cantor, whom the presenter introduced as a neuroscientist specializing in atypical sexuality. The theory that Dr. Cantor promotes is that pedophiles are born with their perverse predilection toward children. He argues that it is not their fault, they are made that way. He presents a distinction between a pedophile and a child molester. He claims that there are many pedophiles who do not act on their urges. He labels them “virtuous pedophiles.” That is an oxymoron if there ever was one.

Dr. Cantor is just one of many in a phalanx of perverts who have been let loose to degenerate and demoralize countries. For example, Marjan Heine advanced the same argument during a 2018 TEDx Talk at the University of Wurzburg. Heine’s presentation was titled: Why Our Perception of Pedophilia Has to Change. Heine defined pedophilia as a person’s inborn sexual preference for pre-adolescent children. She argued that nobody is responsible for their feelings, and so pedophiles are not responsible for their feelings of sexual attraction toward pre-adolescent children. As with Dr. Cantor, Heine argued for acceptance of and inclusion within society of pedophiles. Heine claimed that it is social isolation that drives pedophiles to sexually abuse children. Heine suggested that if the shame of pedophilia was removed, and pedophiles were welcomed into society, they would not act out their impulses to sexually abuse children. Heine’s argument parallels Dr. Cantor’s scheme. She argues, as does Dr. Cantor, that a person’s proclivities can be dissociated from his actions. Thus, she maintains that a pedophile is not necessarily a child molester.

Heine’s and Cantor’s evil sophistry is that a person’s proclivities can be dissociated from his actions. They reason that a pedophile is not necessarily a child molester. They ignore the reality that a person is identified by what he does, not by what he feels or thinks. For example, a football player is a football player because he plays football. He is identified by what he actually does. A person may feel like playing football, but until he actually plays football, he is not a football player. A robber is a robber because he robs. He is identified as a robber because of what he does. He is not a robber if he only desires to take someone else’s property from them, but does not actually take it. A pedophile is a pedophile because he sexually abuses children. He is identified as a pedophile because that is what he does. Heine and Cantor ignore that reality.

To make a distinction between pedophiles and child molesters is to make a distinction without a difference. It is a false dichotomy. Heine and Cantor think they can get away with making that misleading distinction because most people do not know that recidivism among pedophiles is very high. Show me a pedophile who denies he molests children and I will show you a liar. Research has proven that pedophiles do not control their impulses to sexually molest children. For example, an Emory University Study conducted by a leading child abuse researcher, Dr. Gene Abel, found that the average child molester (i.e., pedophile) claims 380 victims in a lifetime.

We can take a lesson from the fable of the scorpion and the frog. In that famous fable, a scorpion asks a frog to carry him over a river. The frog tells the scorpion he will not do it because he is afraid that the scorpion will sting him. But the scorpion pleads with the frog and argues that he would never sting the frog while crossing the river because if he did so, both he and the frog would sink and drown. The frog was convinced by that reasoning and agreed to take the scorpion across the river. The scorpion hopped on the back of the frog, and off they both went across the river. But midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog, dooming them both to drown. When the frog felt the scorpions sting, he asked the scorpion why he stung him since now they would both drown. The scorpion explained, “I am a scorpion; that is what I do.”

Scorpions sting because that is their nature; that is what scorpions do. So also, pedophiles molest children because that is their nature; that is what pedophiles do. A “virtuous pedophile” makes about as much sense as a virtuous scorpion. To welcome pedophiles as accepted members of society is to doom children to destruction, just as the frog was unwittingly doomed as soon as he agreed to give the scorpion a ride on his back. Parents are given a precious gift when God bestows them with children. They are charged with protecting those children from danger. They should not be putting scorpions on their backs and hoping for the best. “It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.” Luke 17:2.

Cantor and Heine are simply fronting for powerful evil forces who are trying to normalize pedophilia in much the same way that clinicians have normalized sodomy. Once you decouple morality from God’s standard, it becomes a slippery slope. What the 60 Minutes Australia program did not reveal is that Dr. James Cantor is a sodomite. He presented a paper about his personal experience as a sodomite: “Being gay and being a graduate student: Double the memberships, four times the problems”, at the Ninety-Ninth Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association in San Francisco.

Of course, Dr. Cantor is going to argue that pedophiles are born that way. He has an agenda. The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (a/k/a LGBT) communities have an evil agenda, which they keep secret from the public at large. Michael Swift’s 1987 Gay Manifesto reveals the dirty secret of the LGBT rights movement. The LGBT community wants the right to sodomize children.

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Former California State Assemblyman Steve Baldwin researched the connection between homosexuality and pederasty. He published his findings in the Spring 2002 Regent University Law Review. Baldwin found that “[s]cientific studies confirm a strong pedophilic predisposition among homosexuals.” One 1988 study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, reported that 86% of pedophiles who victimized boys “described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.” Research statistics further show that homosexuals, as a population, molest children at a rate that is ten to twenty times greater than heterosexuals. Those facts are well known in the homosexual community. San Francisco’s leading homosexual newspaper, The Sentinel, bluntly states that “[t]he love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality.”

Homosexual publications openly promote pederasty and are often populated with travel ads for sex tours to Burma, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and other countries infamous for boy prostitution. Baldwin reveals that “[t]he most popular travel guide for homosexuals, Spartacus Gay Guides, is replete with information about where to find boys for sex and, as a friendly warning, lists penalties in various countries for sodomy with boys if caught.”

Baldwin found that “the mainstream homosexual culture commonly promotes sex with children. Homosexual leaders repeatedly argue for the freedom to engage in consensual sex with children.” He determined that one of the principal aims of the LGBT rights movement is the legalization and promotion of child molestation. Mainstream LGBT organizations such as the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) and the National Coalition of Gay Organizations have passed many organizational resolutions calling for lowering or eliminating age of sexual consent laws, as a way to legalize pedophilia.

Such sin creates a violent and chaotic society. This chaos gives rise to new restrictive laws, which ultimately brings about a police state to reestablish order. Under the new police powers granted to the state, the exercise of God-given rights is suppressed by the government.

It is through orchestrated chaos that the people clamber for order, which brings the public acceptance of government tyranny. One of the principal subversive missions of secret societies is to covertly foment chaos in order to bring about the reaction of oppressive government crackdowns, which they have planned in advance from behind the scenes. The minions of Satan control the government, the reigns of which are in their hands, to steer its course to oppress the people.

The motto ORDO AB CHAO (order out of chaos) is an occult maxim often found in the rites of secret societies. For example, according to Mackey’s Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, ORDO AB CHAO, is “[a] Latin expression, meaning Order out of Chaos. A motto of the Thirty-third Degree, and having the same allusion as lug e tenebris, which see in this work. The invention of this motto is to be attributed to the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish petite at Charleston.” Mackey’s reference to lug e tenebris is probably an allusion to be LUX E TENEBRIS, which is Latin phrase commonly found on Mason documents, that means “light out of darkness.” Jackie Jura of Orwell Today explains:

The puppetmasters create “dis order” so the people will demand “order”. The price of “order” always entails a handing over of control and loss of freedom on the part of the citizenry. Out of “chaos” comes “order” – THEIR order – their new WORLD order. …

The trick of creating chaos and then seizing power under the pretense of putting things back in order is a tried and true method of deception and manipulation. It’s the meaning behind the Latin motto: ORDO AB CHAO meaning ORDER OUT OF CHAOS.

It’s also referred to as the Hegelian Dialect after the philosopher Georg Hegel who wrote about its effectiveness. He described it as: THESIS — ANTI-THESIS — SYN-THESIS.

Others have described it as: PROBLEM — REACTION — SOLUTION in that firstly you create the problem; then secondly you fan the flames to get a reaction; then thirdly (like Johnny-on-the-spot) you provide a solution. The solution is what you were wanting to achieve in the first place, but wouldn’t have been able to achieve under normal circumstances.

Orwell described it as REALITY CONTROL. In 1984: he said, “The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, ‘just to keep people frightened’.”

There are literally HUNDREDS of examples of this method being used effectively throughout the course of history. A well-known example is the bombing of Pearl Harbor which resulted in the United States entering the Second World War. Chaos was required and so chaos was created. That’s how it works. (emphasis in original)

Satan knows that if man cuts loose his passions without regard to the laws of God, the sinful conduct will necessitate a tyrannical government. How so? The escalating sin is, in essence, an encroachment upon the God-given rights of another. Jesus explained the concept:

Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. (Matthew 22:37-40)

The love that Jesus speaks of is not an emotional feeling toward another as Hollywood movies would have you believe. Emotions come and go. Love is not an emotion, it is an action. Jesus explained: that “as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.” (Luke 6:31). Indeed, doing good for another person has nothing at all to do with how you feel about that person. Jesus stated that you should do good to even your enemies who have treated you badly. Luke 6:27-36. God’s word has a built-in dictionary where words are defined by the use of parallelism. One can see in Luke chapter 6 at verses 32 and 33 that God uses parallelism to define love, not as a feeling, but rather as an action of “doing good” to another person.

“For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.” (Luke 6:32) “And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.” (Luke 6:33)

Doing good to another is not just a suggestion, it is a command from God. Jesus states without equivocation that all of the commandments of God are subsumed in the commands to love God and love your neighbor. Love has nothing to do with feelings. You should do nice things for others, whether you “feel” like it or not, because by doing so you are obeying God’s command to do good to others. If one loves his neighbor, he will not violate the command, “thou shalt not steal.” Exodus 20:15. While the command not to steal is a prohibition, Jesus takes it a step further and commands that we are to affirmatively do good to others (i.e., love).

Doing good often involves putting our needs second to the needs of another. If, however, a person does not regard God and seeks to satisfy the pleasure of his fleshly desires, without regard to the detrimental effect of his conduct on others, it will cause the government to step in to protect the aggrieved party. Sinful behavior brings about more crime in society, which is then used as a justification to bring about more government regulation and control of the masses. As explained by Edmond Burke: “Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains on their appetites. Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more there is without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”

That is why Satan wants to drive any thought of God from the minds of men. Indeed, by doing so, a satanically controlled government can impose its tyranny on the people, without much objection from the people, because the people are ignorant that the fetters applied by the government violate the laws of God. For example, the communist collective ideal is based upon larceny. It uses the government to redistribute wealth. The redistribution of wealth is always justified by some purported need, and it usually involves helping children; it is always cloaked in nice sounding labels, like “welfare.” There are always powerful corporate interests that are lined up to be on the receiving end of the government forced transaction.

Rather than charity coming willingly from one individual to another, the government uses its force, through taxation, to take money from one group and give it to another. Taking money from one group and giving it to another group cannot be done if the government accepted the existence of God. If God were to be accepted, then necessarily God’s commands must be then obeyed. The government would have a hard time justifying taking money from one group of persons for the benefit of another group of persons when faced with God’s command: “Thou shalt not steal.” (Exodus 20:15) Using the government as an intermediary does not make the stealing any more justifiable.

San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus Brags ‘We’re Coming for Your Children’ in New Zoom Song

Gay Chorus That Sang ‘We’re Coming For Your Children’ Gawked Over High School Boys In Video About Sports Being ‘Gay’

1 thought on “It is Sodomite Pride Month: They Want Your Children

  1. Very sobering! A definite sign of the time we live in, these facts aught to cause us to”love his appearing” more and more every day,thanks for the great (warning) message.

Leave a Reply to Wayne Reger Cancel reply